International Peer-Reviewed JournalOpen AccessISSN 2456-8880
irejournals@gmail.com+91-7433024337

Home / Current Issue / Paper 1716546

1716546 Vol 9 · Issue 10 Download Paper

Do Political Stories Change How People See Things?

Aman

Subject area: Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities  ·  Area of research: Political Narratives in Elections

DOI: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I10-1716546

Abstract

In 2025, India's democracy, which was once regarded to be the greatest and most active in the world, is at a very vital and perilous stage. The Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) report considers the country a "electoral autocracy" since it has lost many democratic liberties during the past ten years. Some of the most essential democratic rights that have gotten worse are freedom of speech, media independence, civil liberties, and institutional autonomy. This is like what happened in the past when there were authoritarian trends, such the Emergency era of the 1970s. The 2025 Bihar elections brought these issues to light, with many people blaming "vote chori" (vote fraud) and manipulating voter records to target weak groups. The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the Election Commission of India (ECI) both firmly deny that there is any political division or lack of trust, even though they have made technological changes to make things more open. People in different sections of the country have extremely varied political experiences. People in Haryana trust the democratic process and the government is quite stable. In Punjab, on the other hand, there is still social unrest and worries about the validity of elections. Democratization is further impeded by the proliferation of religion and social differences, institutional constraints on judicial and media entities, and the repression of dissent. Economic inequality and populist majoritarianism make democratic problems worse.

Keywords

Autocracy, Democracy, Liberties, Institutions, Majoritarianism

References

[1] Anderson, C. J., & Guillory, C. A. (1997). Political institutions and satisfaction with democracy. American Political Science Review, 91(1), 66–81.

[2] Anderson, C. J., & Tverdova, Y. V. (2003). Corruption, political allegiances, and attitudes toward government. American Journal of Political Science, 47(1), 91–109.

[3] Anderson, C. J., Blais, A., Bowler, S., & Donovan, T. (2005). Losers’ Consent: Elections and Democratic Legitimacy. Oxford University Press.

[4] Bermeo, N. (2016). On democratic backsliding. Journal of Democracy, 27(1), 5–19.

[5] Dahl, R. A. (various works on polyarchy; you can cite Polyarchy: Participation and Opposition, 1971).

[6] Easton, D. (1975). A re assessment of the concept of political support. British Journal of Political Science, 5(4), 435–457.

[7] Freedom House. (2023). Freedom in the World 2023. Freedom House.

[8] Jaffrelot, C. (2021). Modi’s India: Hindu Nationalism and the Rise of Ethnic Democracy. Princeton University Press.

[9] Khosla, M. (2020). India’s Founding Moment: The Constitution of a Most Surprising Democracy. Harvard University Press.

[10] Linde, J., & Ekman, J. (2003). Satisfaction with democracy: A note on a frequently used indicator. European Journal of Political Research, 42(3), 391–408.

[11] Levitsky, S., & Ziblatt, D. (2018). How Democracies Die. Crown.

[12] Lührmann, A., & Lindberg, S. I. (2019). A third wave of autocratization is here. Democratization, 26(7), 1095–1113.

[13] Norris, P. (2011). Democratic Deficit: Critical Citizens Revisited. Cambridge University Press.

[14] Palshikar, S., Suri, K. C., & Yadav, Y. (Eds.). (2014). Party Competition in Indian States: Electoral Politics in Post Congress Polity. Oxford University Press.

[15] Putnam, R. D. (1993). Making Democracy Work: Civic Traditions in Modern Italy. Princeton University Press.

[16] Quraishi, S. Y. (2014). An Undocumented Wonder: The Making of the Great Indian Election. Rupa.

[17] Singh, G. (2000). Ethnic Conflict in India: A Case-Study of Punjab. Palgrave Macmillan.

[18] Singh, P. (2008). Federalism, Nationalism and Development: India and the Punjab Economy. Routledge.

[19] V Dem Institute. (2023). Democracy Report 2023. University of Gothenburg.

How to cite this paper

Aman "Do Political Stories Change How People See Things?" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 9 Issue 10 2026 Page 2024-2030 https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I10-1716546
Aman "Do Political Stories Change How People See Things?" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 9, no. 10, Apr. 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I10-1716546
Aman (2026). Do Political Stories Change How People See Things?. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 9(10). doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I10-1716546
Aman "Do Political Stories Change How People See Things?" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 9, no. 10, Apr. 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I10-1716546
@article{1716546,
      author = {Aman},
      title = {Do Political Stories Change How People See Things?},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {9},
      number = {10},
      pages = {2024-2030},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1716546.pdf},
      abstract = {In 2025, India's democracy, which was once regarded to be the greatest and most active in the world, is at a very vital and perilous stage. The Varieties of Democracy (V-Dem) report considers the country a "electoral autocracy" since it has lost many democratic liberties during the past ten years. Some of the most essential democratic rights that have gotten worse are freedom of speech, media independence, civil liberties, and institutional autonomy. This is like what happened in the past when there were authoritarian trends, such the Emergency era of the 1970s. The 2025 Bihar elections brought these issues to light, with many people blaming "vote chori" (vote fraud) and manipulating voter records to target weak groups. The Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) and the Election Commission of India (ECI) both firmly deny that there is any political division or lack of trust, even though they have made technological changes to make things more open. People in different sections of the country have extremely varied political experiences. People in Haryana trust the democratic process and the government is quite stable. In Punjab, on the other hand, there is still social unrest and worries about the validity of elections. Democratization is further impeded by the proliferation of religion and social differences, institutional constraints on judicial and media entities, and the repression of dissent. Economic inequality and populist majoritarianism make democratic problems worse.},
      keywords = {Autocracy, Democracy, Liberties, Institutions, Majoritarianism},
      month = {April},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I10-1716546}
  }