Home / Current Issue / Paper 1716579
Comparative Physicochemical Characterization of some Biomass Wastes for Bio-plastic Production
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Biomass Wastes for Bio-plastic
DOI: 10.64388/IREV9I10-1716579
Abstract
The increasing environmental burden of petroleum-based plastics has accelerated the search for sustainable and biodegradable alternatives derived from renewable biomass. This study presents a comparative physicochemical, thermal, and structural characterization of selected agricultural wastes-cassava peels, plantain peels, orange peels, and sugarcane bagasse-to evaluate their suitability for bioplastic production. The samples were collected from local sources and processed through washing, drying, and into uniform particles. Standard analytical methods were used to determine moisture content, ash content, cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin, and starch composition. Thermal stability was evaluated using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), crystallinity was assessed via X-ray diffraction (XRD), functional groups were identified using Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, and surface morphology was examined through scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The results revealed that sugarcane bagasse exhibited the highest cellulose content (57.22 %), crystallinity index (59.3%), and thermal degradation onset (272.8 °C), indicating superior structural integrity and thermal resistance. Cassava peels demonstrated high starch content, supporting their suitability for thermoplastic starch-based bioplastics. Plantain and orange peels showed comparatively lower structural properties but possess potential as supplementary blending materials. FTIR analysis confirmed the presence of key functional groups (–OH, C=O, and C–O), essential for polymer interactions, while SEM images revealed dense fibrous networks in sugarcane bagasse and cassava peels. Overall, the suitability ranking for bioplastic production was sugarcane bagasse > cassava peels > plantain peels > orange peels. The study highlights the potential of utilizing locally available agricultural residues for sustainable bioplastic development, supporting circular economy principles and waste valorisation strategies.
Keywords
Bioplastics, Agricultural Waste, Physicochemical Characterization, Sugarcane Bagasse, Cassava Peels, Waste Valorisation, Sustainable Materials.
References
[1] Adebisi, O., Afolabi, T., & Oladipo, M. (2020). Evaluation of starch-based bioplastics from cassava peels for packaging applications. Nigerian Journal of Polymer Science, 5(2), 45–58.
[2] Adekoya, A., & Ijaware, O. (2020). Biodegradable thermoplastic starch films from cassava peel waste. Journal of Materials Science and Engineering, 8(1), 12–23.
[3] Adeniran, A., Okonkwo, E., & Adediran, O. (2021). Plastic waste management and environmental sustainability in Nigerian urban centers. Environmental Challenges, 5(2), 100–112.
[4] Adeyemo, O., Ogunleye, T., & Olawale, S. (2021). Circular economy approaches for bioplastic production from agricultural residues in Nigeria. Sustainable Materials and Technologies, 28, 101–115.
[5] Agbabiaka, T., Eze, U., & Okoro, C. (2020). Lignocellulosic composition of selected agricultural residues for green materials production. Biomass and Bioenergy, 135, 105–115.
[6] Edeh, E., Nwokocha, C., & Ogbuewu, I. (2021). Characterization of cassava peel starch for bioplastic film production. Nigerian Journal of Biotechnology, 12(1), 34–47.
[7] Egeba, A. (2023). Advances in green chemistry approaches for biopolymer extraction from lignocellulosic biomass. International Journal of Polymer Science, 18(1), 22–39.
[8] Emadian, S. M., Onay, T. T., & Demirel, B. (2017). Biodegradation of bioplastics in natural environments. Waste Management, 59, 526–536.
[9] Geyer, R., Jambeck, J., & Law, K. (2017). Production, use, and fate of all plastics ever made. Science Advances, 3(7), e1700782.
[10] John, M. J., & Thomas, S. (2008). Biofibres and biocomposites. Carbohydrate Polymers, 71(3), 343–364.
[11] Nanda, S., Mohanty, A., & Misra, M. (2021). Bioplastics: Sustainable alternatives to petrochemical plastics. Journal of Cleaner Production, 289, 125–140.
[12] Ogunbiyi, O., Adeyemi, L., & Fashola, M. (2020). Plastic pollution in Nigeria: Status, challenges, and solutions. Environmental Science and Policy, 110, 112–123.
[13] Ogunjobi, O., Eze, F., & Adeyemo, J. (2020). Economic prospects of agricultural waste-based bioplastics in Nigeria. Journal of Environmental Management, 265, 110–125.
[14] Ogunleye, T., Adeyemo, O., & Oladipo, M. (2018). Bioplastic development from agricultural starch-based materials. Journal of Cleaner Production, 172, 233–245.
[15] Okonkwo, E., Nwafor, C., & Eze, S. (2018). Hemicellulose structure and its role in polymer flexibility. Polymer Degradation and Stability, 152, 122–130.
[16] Okoro, C., Eze, U., & Agbabiaka, T. (2020). Development of biodegradable starch-based films from cassava and yam peels. Journal of Bioplastics, 5(2), 15–28.
[17] Oladipo, M., Afolabi, T., & Adeyemi, K. (2021). Agricultural residues as raw materials for bioplastics in sub-Saharan Africa. Sustainable Chemistry and Engineering, 9(7), 2155–2170.
[18] Oluwatosin, O., Adebayo, M., & Okonkwo, P. (2019). Characterization of cassava and plantain peel wastes for polymeric film development. African Journal of Biotechnology, 18(45), 1023–1034.
[19] Renner, C., Nguyen, L., & Thomas, S. (2019). Lignocellulosic biomass: A sustainable feedstock for bioplastic production. Bioresource Technology, 276, 110–120.
How to cite this paper
@article{1716579,
author = {Ademola Bolanle Raheem, Ifeanyichukwu Edeh},
title = {Comparative Physicochemical Characterization of some Biomass Wastes for Bio-plastic Production},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {9},
number = {10},
pages = {1855-1863},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1716579.pdf},
abstract = {The increasing environmental burden of petroleum-based plastics has accelerated the search for sustainable and biodegradable alternatives derived from renewable biomass. This study presents a comparative physicochemical, thermal, and structural characterization of selected agricultural wastes-cassava peels, plantain peels, orange peels, and sugarcane bagasse-to evaluate their suitability for bioplastic production. The samples were collected from local sources and processed through washing, drying, and into uniform particles. Standard analytical methods were used to determine moisture content, ash content, cellulose, hemicellulose, lignin, and starch composition. Thermal stability was evaluated using thermogravimetric analysis (TGA), crystallinity was assessed via X-ray diffraction (XRD), functional groups were identified using Fourier Transform Infrared (FTIR) spectroscopy, and surface morphology was examined through scanning electron microscopy (SEM). The results revealed that sugarcane bagasse exhibited the highest cellulose content (57.22 %), crystallinity index (59.3%), and thermal degradation onset (272.8 °C), indicating superior structural integrity and thermal resistance. Cassava peels demonstrated high starch content, supporting their suitability for thermoplastic starch-based bioplastics. Plantain and orange peels showed comparatively lower structural properties but possess potential as supplementary blending materials. FTIR analysis confirmed the presence of key functional groups (–OH, C=O, and C–O), essential for polymer interactions, while SEM images revealed dense fibrous networks in sugarcane bagasse and cassava peels. Overall, the suitability ranking for bioplastic production was sugarcane bagasse > cassava peels > plantain peels > orange peels. The study highlights the potential of utilizing locally available agricultural residues for sustainable bioplastic development, supporting circular economy principles and waste valorisation strategies.},
keywords = {Bioplastics, Agricultural Waste, Physicochemical Characterization, Sugarcane Bagasse, Cassava Peels, Waste Valorisation, Sustainable Materials.},
month = {April},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I10-1716579}
}