International Peer-Reviewed JournalOpen AccessISSN 2456-8880
irejournals@gmail.com+91-7433024337

Home / Current Issue / Paper 1716762

1716762 Vol 9 · Issue 10 Download Paper

A Realist's Nightmare: Enduring Warnings of Dr. Strangelove

Roshni Mehta

Subject area: Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities  ·  Area of research: Mutually Assured Destruction Doctrine

DOI: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I10-1716762

Abstract

Stanley Kubrick's Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb (1964) operates as far more than political satire. Examined through the theoretical lenses of classical realism, the security dilemma, and mutually assured destruction (MAD), it reveals itself as a systematic critique of the assumptions underpinning nuclear deterrence. This article argues that the film functions as a 'realist nightmare' a world in which rational deterrence logic is fatally undermined by human irrationality, bureaucratic dysfunction, and the paradoxes of automated destruction. Six decades later, the structural dynamics Kubrick dramatised nuclear rivalry, great-power competition, and technological escalation remain disturbingly contemporary.

References

[1] Daniel Ellsberg, The Doomsday Machine: Confessions of a Nuclear War Planner (New York: Bloomsbury, 2017).

[2] John J. Mearsheimer, The Tragedy of Great Power Politics (New York: W.W. Norton, 2001); Kenneth Waltz, Theory of International Politics (Reading: Addison-Wesley, 1979).

[3] Robert Jervis, Perception and Misperception in International Politics (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1976).

[4] Arms Control Association, Nuclear Deterrence and Stability (2004); Lawrence Freedman, The Evolution of Nuclear Strategy (London: Palgrave Macmillan, 2003).

[5] Scott D. Sagan, The Limits of Safety: Organizations, Accidents and Nuclear Weapons (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1993).

[6] Paul Bracken, The Second Nuclear Age (New York: St. Martin's Press, 2012).

[7] Kenneth Waltz, 'Nuclear Myths and Political Realities,' American Political Science Review 84, no. 3 (1990): 731–745.

[8] Thomas C. Schelling, Arms and Influence (New Haven: Yale University Press, 1966).

[9] Robert Jervis, The Meaning of the Nuclear Revolution (Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1989).

[10] Nina Tannenwald, The Nuclear Taboo: The United States and the Non-Use of Nuclear Weapons Since 1945 (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2007).

[11] Scott D. Sagan and Kenneth N. Waltz, The Spread of Nuclear Weapons: A Debate Renewed (New York: W.W. Norton, 2003).

[12] Graham Allison and Philip Zelikow, Essence of Decision: Explaining the Cuban Missile Crisis (New York: Longman, 1999).

[13] Peter Kramer, Dr. Strangelove (London: BFI Publishing, 2014).

[14] Charles Maland, Dr. Strangelove (BFI Film Classics) (London: BFI Publishing, 2008).

[15] Marc Trachtenberg, History and Strategy (Princeton: Princeton University Press, 1991).

[16] James Johnson, 'Artificial Intelligence and the Future of Nuclear Strategy,' Journal of Strategic Studies, 2020.

[17] Stanley Kubrick, Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb. Film. Columbia Pictures, 1964.

How to cite this paper

Roshni Mehta "A Realist's Nightmare: Enduring Warnings of Dr. Strangelove" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 9 Issue 10 2026 Page 2485-2488 https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I10-1716762
Roshni Mehta "A Realist's Nightmare: Enduring Warnings of Dr. Strangelove" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 9, no. 10, Apr. 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I10-1716762
Roshni Mehta (2026). A Realist's Nightmare: Enduring Warnings of Dr. Strangelove. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 9(10). doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I10-1716762
Roshni Mehta "A Realist's Nightmare: Enduring Warnings of Dr. Strangelove" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 9, no. 10, Apr. 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I10-1716762
@article{1716762,
      author = {Roshni Mehta},
      title = {A Realist's Nightmare: Enduring Warnings of Dr. Strangelove},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {9},
      number = {10},
      pages = {2485-2488},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1716762.pdf},
      abstract = {Stanley Kubrick's Dr. Strangelove or: How I Learned to Stop Worrying and Love the Bomb (1964) operates as far more than political satire. Examined through the theoretical lenses of classical realism, the security dilemma, and mutually assured destruction (MAD), it reveals itself as a systematic critique of the assumptions underpinning nuclear deterrence. This article argues that the film functions as a 'realist nightmare'  a world in which rational deterrence logic is fatally undermined by human irrationality, bureaucratic dysfunction, and the paradoxes of automated destruction. Six decades later, the structural dynamics Kubrick dramatised  nuclear rivalry, great-power competition, and technological escalation remain disturbingly contemporary.},
      month = {April},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I10-1716762}
  }