Home / Current Issue / Paper 1716876
A Psychoanalytic Exploration of the Tension Between Actor Identity and Villain Manifestation in the Nollywood Film Brotherhood, by Jade Osiberu
Subject area: Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities · Area of research: Psychoanalytic Film Studies
DOI: 10.64388/IREV9I10-1716876
Abstract
This study explores the psychological complexities inherent in the performance of villainous roles within the contemporary Nollywood thriller, Brotherhood (Osiberu, 2022). The primary aim of this research is to investigate how actors navigate the psychic friction between their personal identities and the darker, antagonistic traits of their characters. To achieve this, the study pursues two specific objectives: first, to analyse the psychological mechanisms actors employ to inhabit the persona of the villain, and second, to examine how these performances challenge the boundaries of the actor's own ego and moral framework. Guided by Freudian and Jungian psychoanalytic theories—specifically the concepts of the shadow self and the uncanny—the research adopts a qualitative methodology, utilizing in-depth content analysis of character performances and representative interviews. The findings reveal that the internalization of villainy often forces actors to confront repressed aspects of their own psyche, leading to a profound, sometimes distressing, blurring of the lines between the self and the performer. The study concludes that the mastery of villainous roles in Brotherhood is not merely a technical skill but a deep psychological negotiation that reshapes the actor's identity, suggesting that acting serves as a conduit for exploring the human capacity for darkness.
Keywords
Psychoanalysis, Nollywood, Brotherhood, Actor Identity, Villainy, Shadow Self, Character Manifestation.
References
[1] Bates, B. (2004). The way of the actor: A path to knowledge and power. Shambhala Publications.
[2] Blair, R. (2008). The actor, image, and action: Acting and cognitive neuroscience. Routledge.
[3] Carnicke, S. M. (2009). Stanislavski in focus: An acting master for the twenty-first century (2nd ed.). Routledge.
[4] Creswell, J. W. (2014). Research design: Qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (4th ed.). SAGE Publications.
[5] Freud, S. (1915). Repression. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 14, pp. 141–158). Hogarth Press.
[6] Freud, S. (1919). The uncanny. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 17, pp. 217–256). Hogarth Press.
[7] Freud, S. (1923). The ego and the id. In J. Strachey (Ed. & Trans.), The standard edition of the complete psychological works of Sigmund Freud (Vol. 19, pp. 1–66). Hogarth Press.
[8] Goldstein, T. R., & Bloom, P. (2011). The mind on stage: Why cognitive scientists should study acting. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15(4), 141–142. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2011.02.003
[9] Guardian Life. (2022, October 3). Falz opens up about playing Ramsey in Brotherhood. Guardian Newspapers Nigeria.
[10] Haynes, J. (2011). Nollywood: The creation of Nigerian film genres. University of Chicago Press.
[11] Jung, C. G. (1959). The archetypes and the collective unconscious (R. F. C. Hull, Trans.). In H. Read et al. (Eds.), The collected works of C. G. Jung (Vol. 9, Part 1). Princeton University Press.
[12] Krasner, D. (2000). Method acting reconsidered: Theory, practice, future. St. Martin's Press.
[13] Krings, M., & Okome, O. (Eds.). (2013). Global Nollywood: The transnational dimensions of an African video film industry. Indiana University Press.
[14] Lapsley, R., & Westlake, M. (2006). Film theory: An introduction (2nd ed.). Manchester University Press.
[15] Meltzoff, A. N. (2005). Imitation and other minds: The like me hypothesis. In S. Hurley & N. Chater (Eds.), Perspectives on imitation: From neuroscience to social science (Vol. 2, pp. 55–77). MIT Press.
[16] Neve, B. (2005). The dark side of character: Villainy in American cinema. In S. Neale (Ed.), Genre and contemporary Hollywood (pp. 220–236). BFI Publishing.
[17] Nwosu, C. (2016). Actor training in Nigeria: Current practices and future directions. Journal of Theatre and Cultural Studies, 4(2), 45–62.
[18] Okafor, C. (2018). Moral complexity and social critique in contemporary Nollywood. African Cinema Journal, 9(1), 77–95.
[19] Okoye, C. (2007). Looking at ourselves in the mirror: The Nollywood film as social document. African Performance Review, 1(1), 30–52.
[20] Osiberu, J. (Director). (2022). Brotherhood [Film]. Inkblot Productions; Amazon Prime Video.
[21] Oyelaran, T. (2020). Mental health and the performing arts in Nigeria: A call for institutional support. Nigerian Journal of Arts and Culture, 12(1), 18–34.
[22] Pulse Nigeria. (2022, September 28). Falz talks about the psychological demands of playing Ramsey. Pulse Entertainment Nigeria.
[23] Stanislavski, K. (1936). An actor prepares (E. R. Hapgood, Trans.). Theatre Arts Books.
[24] Stevens, A. (1990). On Jung. Routledge.
How to cite this paper
@article{1716876,
author = {Isabella Omutiko Mulama},
title = {A Psychoanalytic Exploration of the Tension Between Actor Identity and Villain Manifestation in the Nollywood Film Brotherhood, by Jade Osiberu},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {9},
number = {10},
pages = {3445-3453},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1716876.pdf},
abstract = {This study explores the psychological complexities inherent in the performance of villainous roles within the contemporary Nollywood thriller, Brotherhood (Osiberu, 2022). The primary aim of this research is to investigate how actors navigate the psychic friction between their personal identities and the darker, antagonistic traits of their characters. To achieve this, the study pursues two specific objectives: first, to analyse the psychological mechanisms actors employ to inhabit the persona of the villain, and second, to examine how these performances challenge the boundaries of the actor's own ego and moral framework. Guided by Freudian and Jungian psychoanalytic theories—specifically the concepts of the shadow self and the uncanny—the research adopts a qualitative methodology, utilizing in-depth content analysis of character performances and representative interviews. The findings reveal that the internalization of villainy often forces actors to confront repressed aspects of their own psyche, leading to a profound, sometimes distressing, blurring of the lines between the self and the performer. The study concludes that the mastery of villainous roles in Brotherhood is not merely a technical skill but a deep psychological negotiation that reshapes the actor's identity, suggesting that acting serves as a conduit for exploring the human capacity for darkness.},
keywords = {Psychoanalysis, Nollywood, Brotherhood, Actor Identity, Villainy, Shadow Self, Character Manifestation.},
month = {April},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I10-1716876}
}