International Peer-Reviewed JournalOpen AccessISSN 2456-8880
irejournals@gmail.com+91-7433024337

Home / Current Issue / Paper 1717009

1717009 Vol 9 · Issue 10 Download Paper

Machine Learning and M2M Communication in Smart Grids: A Review, Taxonomy, and Future Directions for Fault Management

Onwughalu Markanthony Kenechi Eseosa Omorogiuwa Ehikhamenle Matthew

Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology  ·  Area of research: Smart Grid Technology

DOI: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I10-1717009

Abstract

The transformation of power distribution systems toward smart grid architectures has intensified the need for intelligent, communication-aware, and resilient fault management solutions, particularly in developing-region networks where reliability indices remain critically constrained. While machine learning techniques have demonstrated transformative capabilities in fault detection and classification, achieving superior accuracy through deep graph learning, spatial-temporal recurrent neural networks, and hybrid artificial intelligence approaches, these studies predominantly operate under idealised communication assumptions that ignore the latency, jitter, and packet loss inherent in real-world machine-to-machine deployments. Conversely, existing machine-to-machine communication protocols for smart grids, including LoRaWAN, NB-IoT, and ZigBee, have been studied in isolation from the diagnostic algorithms they are intended to support. This critical disconnect between algorithm accuracy and deployment reality creates a significant gap in the literature: no unified framework currently exists to evaluate machine learning performance under realistic machine-to-machine communication constraints or to optimise communication parameters for diagnostic reliability.This paper presents a comprehensive review of machine learning and machine-to-machine communication integration for low-voltage and medium-voltage distribution fault management, structured around a novel taxonomy of communication-aware architectures. We systematically analyse existing approaches across four categories: communication-agnostic machine learning, communication-assisted diagnostics, communication-resilient algorithms, and fully integrated machine-to-machine machine learning systems. Through comparative analysis of verified literature spanning deep reinforcement learning for service restoration, multi-agent coordination for automated switching, and federated learning for distributed intelligence, we identify critical research gaps, including the absence of electrical-communication co-simulation platforms, underdeveloped edge-based inference architectures, and insufficient validation under non-independent and identically distributed data conditions. We further propose a unified conceptual framework integrating electrical feeder dynamics, machine-to-machine communication impairments, and machine learning inference within a coordinated architecture, validated against Nigerian distribution network parameters as a representative developing-region case study. By consolidating existing knowledge and highlighting the imperative for communication-machine learning co-design, this work provides clear directions for advancing intelligent, resilient, and deployable fault management systems in next-generation distribution networks.

Keywords

Machine-To-Machine Communication; Machine Learning; Fault Detection; Distribution Networks; Smart Grids; Communication-Aware Architectures; Co-Simulation; Developing Regions

References

[1] Srivastava, I., Bhat, S., Vardhan, B., & Bokde, N. (2022). Fault detection, isolation and service restoration in modern power distribution systems: A review. Energies, 15(19), 7264. https://doi.org/10.3390/en15197264

[2] Vaish, R., Dwivedi, U., Tewari, S., & Tripathi, S. M. (2021). Machine learning applications in power system fault diagnosis: Research advancements and perspectives. Engineering Applications of Artificial Intelligence, 106, 104504.

[3] Hu, J., He, H., & Blaabjerg, F. (2023). Fault location and classification for distribution systems based on deep graph learning methods. Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy. https://doi.org/10.35833/MPCE.2022.000204

[4] Zhang, Y., Qiu, F., Hong, T., Wang, Z., & Li, F. (2022). Hybrid imitation learning for real-time service restoration in resilient distribution systems. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 18(4), 2089-2099. https://doi.org/10.1109/TII.2021.3078110

[5] Wang, Y., Qiu, D., & Strbac, G. (2022). Multi-agent deep reinforcement learning for resilience-driven routing and scheduling of mobile energy storage systems. Applied Energy, 310, 118575. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2022.118575

[6] Li, Q., Luo, H., Cheng, H., Deng, Y., Sun, W., Li, W., & Liu, Z. (2023). Incipient fault detection in power distribution system: A time-frequency embedded deep-learning-based approach. IEEE Transactions on Instrumentation and Measurement, 72, 1-12.

[7] Nguyen, B. L. H., Vu, T., Nguyen, T.-T., Panwar, M., & Hovsapian, R. (2022). Spatial-temporal recurrent graph neural networks for fault diagnostics in power distribution systems. IEEE Access, 10, 1-1.

[8] Chen, Z., Cai, S., & Meliopoulos, A. P. S. (2024). A real-time deep learning-based fault diagnosis framework in power distribution systems with PVs. IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies (ISGT), Washington DC, Feb 19-22, 2024.

[9] Maurya, P., Vidhate, D., Nayak, R., Madhavi, P., Gawande, P., & Roshan, R. (2024). Self-healing grids: AI techniques for automatic restoration after outages. Power System Technology.

[10] Almasoudi, F. M. (2023). Enhancing power grid resilience through real-time fault detection and remediation using advanced hybrid machine learning models. Sustainability, 15(11), 8723. https://doi.org/10.3390/su15118723

[11] Arsoniadis, C. G., & Nikolaidis, V. C. (2024). A machine learning based fault location method for power distribution systems using wavelet scattering networks. Sustainable Energy, Grids and Networks, 40, 101551. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.segan.2024.101551

[12] Mamuya, Y. D., Lee, Y. D., Shen, J. W., Shafiullah, M., & Kuo, C. C. (2020). Application of machine learning for fault classification and location in a radial distribution grid. Applied Sciences, 10(14), 4965.

[13] Liang, W., Zhao, Y., Zhang, Z., You, Y., & Li, Y. (2023). Hybrid artificial intelligence for power grid line fault diagnosis and restoration auxiliary decision-making. 2023 5th Asia-Pacific Conference on Electrical Power and Energy Engineering (ACPEE).

[14] Sampaio, R., Melo, L., Leão, R., Barroso, G., & Bezerra, J. (2017). Automatic restoration system for power distribution networks based on multi-agent systems. IET Generation, Transmission & Distribution, 11(4), 475-484.

[15] Shafiullah, M., Abido, M., & Abdel-Fattah, T. (2018). Distribution grids fault location employing ST-based optimised machine learning approach. Energies, 11(11), 3033.

[16] Shafiullah, M., Alshumayri, K., & Alam, M. (2022). Machine learning tools for active distribution grid fault diagnosis. Advances in Engineering Software, 173, 103180.

[17] Liu, Y., Fan, R., & Terzija, V. (2016). Power system restoration: A literature review from 2006 to 2016. Journal of Modern Power Systems and Clean Energy, 4(3), 332-341.

[18] Zaben, M. M., Worku, M. Y., Hassan, M. A., & Abido, M. (2020). Machine learning methods for fault diagnosis in AC microgrids: A systematic review. IEEE Access, 8, 202141-202158.

[19] Rafique, F., Fu, L., & Mai, R. (2021). End-to-end machine learning for fault detection and classification in power transmission lines. Electric Power Systems Research, 199, 107430.

[20] Singh, A. R., Kumar, R. S., Bajaj, M., Khadse, C. B., & Zaitsev, I. (2024). Machine learning-based energy management and power forecasting in grid-connected microgrids. Scientific Reports, 14, 19207.

[21] Khoudry, E., Belfqih, A., Ouaderhman, T., Boukherouaa, J., & Elmariami, F. (2020). A real-time fault diagnosis system for high-speed power system protection based on machine learning algorithms. International Journal of Electrical and Computer Engineering (IJECE), 10(6), 6486-6495.

[22] Qiu, S., Cui, X., Ping, Z., Shan, N., Li, Z., Bao, X., & Xu, X. (2023). Deep learning techniques in intelligent fault diagnosis and prognosis for industrial systems: A review. Sensors, 23(3), 1502.

[23] Omitaomu, O., & Niu, H. (2021). Artificial intelligence techniques in smart grid: A survey. Smart Cities, 4(2), 548-568.

[24] Shakiba, F. M., Azizi, S. M., Zhou, M., & Abusorrah, A. (2022). Application of machine learning methods in fault detection and classification of power transmission lines: A survey. Artificial Intelligence Review, 55(3), 2315-2375.

[25] Mbamaluikem, P. O., Awelewa, A., & Samuel, I. (2018). An artificial neural network-based intelligent fault classification system for the 33-kV Nigeria transmission line. 2018 IEEE PES/IAS PowerAfrica, 1-5.

[26] Olalekan, H. W., Augustine, O. I., & Mathurine, G. (2024). Artificial neural network-based fault detection on Nigerian 330 kV power transmission line. International Journal of Research and Review, 11(10), 518-535. https://doi.org/10.52403/ijrr.20241047

[27] Peter, V. M., Okpura, N., & Udofia, K. (2025). Intelligent fault diagnosis in 330 kV power networks using SVM and ANN techniques: Case of the Onitsha--New Haven route. Journal of Engineering Research and Reports, 27(1), 1-14.

[28] Ekanem, N. U., Umoren, M., & Udofia, K. (2025). Reinforcement learning-assisted voltage stability analysis of the Nigerian power grid using DVR and BESS. Journal of Engineering Research and Reports.

[29] Oruma, A. M., Mahmud, I., Adamu, U. A., Wakawa, S. Y., Idris, G., & Mustapha, M. (2024). Fault detection method based on artificial neural network for 330 kV Nigerian transmission line. International Journal of Innovative Science and Research Technology (IJISRT).

[30] Ifeanyi, C. M., Ogbu, G., & Chukwu, L. (2025). Power system restoration using artificial neural network (ANN). American Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Innovation, 4(3), 233-243.

[31] Ali, H., Solomon, C., Edward, M. B., Suresh Babu, K., Smerat, A., Alam, T., Sabirov, S., & Sengan, S. (2026). Deep reinforcement learning for real-time energy dispatch in smart grids with high renewable penetration. Clean Energy Science and Technology, 4(1). https://doi.org/10.18686/cest633

[32] Yin, T., Wulff, S., Pierre, J. W., & Amidan, B. (2024). Event detection and classification using machine learning applied to PMU data for the Western US Power System. IEEE Smart Grid Synchronized Measurement Applications (SGSMA). https://doi.org/10.1109/SGSMA58694.2024.10571471

[33] Lal, M. D., & Varadarajan, R. (2023). A review of machine learning approaches in synchrophasor technology. IEEE Access, 11, 33520-33541.

[34] A survey on IoT-based smart electrical systems. Energies, 19(4), 965. https://doi.org/10.3390/en19040965

[35] Vahidi, S., Ghafouri, M., Au, M., et al. (2023). Security of wide-area monitoring, protection, and control (WAMPAC) systems of the smart grid: A survey on challenges and opportunities. IEEE Communications Surveys and Tutorials, 25(2), 1294-1335.

[36] A review of multi-microgrids operation and control from a cyber-physical systems perspective. Computers, 14(10), 409. https://doi.org/10.3390/computers14100409

[37] Implementation of edge AI for early fault detection in IoT networks. Discover Applied Sciences. https://doi.org/10.1007/s43926-025-00196-4

[38] Chen, S.-J., Chiu, W.-Y., & Liu, W.-J. (2021). User preference-based demand response for smart home energy management using multiobjective reinforcement learning. IEEE Access, 9, 161627-161637.

[39] Amer, A. A., Shaban, K., & Massoud, A. M. (2023). DRL-HEMS: Deep reinforcement learning agent for demand response in home energy management systems. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 14, 239-250.

[40] Alfaverh, F., & Denai, M. (2020). Demand response strategy based on reinforcement learning and fuzzy reasoning for home energy management. IEEE Access, 8, 39310-39321.

[41] Liu, W., Wang, Y., Jiang, F., Cheng, Y., Rong, J., Wang, C., & Peng, J. (2021). A real-time demand response strategy of home energy management by using distributed deep reinforcement learning. IEEE HPCC/DSS/SmartCity/DependSys, 988-995.

[42] Deep reinforcement learning for optimal microgrid energy management with renewable energy and electric vehicle integration. Applied Soft Computing, 2025, 113180. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asoc.2025.113180

[43] Optimal energy management in smart energy systems: A deep reinforcement learning approach. Energy Reports, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egyr.2024.11.024

[44] Digital twin-driven identification of fault situation in distribution networks connected to distributed wind power. International Journal of Electrical Power & Energy Systems, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijepes.2023.109726

[45] A review on digital twins for power generation and distribution. Journal of Cyber Security and Mobility, 2023. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10207-023-00784-x

[46] Introduction to digital twins for the smart grid. arXiv, 2025. https://arxiv.org/abs/2602.14256

[47] Tzanis, N., Andriopoulos, N., Magklaras, A., Mylonas, E., Birbas, M., & Birbas, A. (2020). A hybrid cyber-physical digital twin approach for smart grid fault prediction. IEEE Conference on Industrial Cyberphysical Systems (ICPS), 393-397. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPS48405.2020.9274723

[48] You, M., Wang, Q., Sun, H., Castro, I., & Jiang, J. (2022). Digital twins-based day-ahead integrated energy system scheduling under load and renewable energy uncertainties. Applied Energy, 305, 117899. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.117899

[49] Zhang, Y., Luo, J., Zhu, W., Wu, Y., & Zhang, X. (2022). Application of digital twins in smart grids. IEEE ICPICS, 9873758. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICPICS55264.2022.9873758

[50] Mourtzis, D., Angelopoulos, J., & Panopoulos, N. (2022). Development of a PSS for smart grid energy distribution optimization based on digital twin. Procedia CIRP, 107, 1138-1143. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2022.05.121

[51] Xing, J., Sun, S., Yu, P., Li, Y., Cheng, Y., Wang, Y., Li, S., & Zhu, J. (2022). Multi-energy simulation and optimal scheduling strategy based on digital twin. IEEE PSGEC, 9881079. https://doi.org/10.1109/PSGEC54663.2022.9881079

[52] DRL Home Energy Management Review, 2024; Applications of deep reinforcement learning for home energy management systems: A review. Energies, 17(24), 6420. https://doi.org/10.3390/en17246420

[53] DRL Renewable Energy Scheduling; Renewable energy scheduling for e-commerce systems. IEEE, 2021.

[54] DRL Smart Grid Scheduling, Smart grid scheduling with machine learning. IEEE, 2020.

How to cite this paper

Onwughalu Markanthony Kenechi, Eseosa Omorogiuwa, Ehikhamenle Matthew "Machine Learning and M2M Communication in Smart Grids: A Review, Taxonomy, and Future Directions for Fault Management" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 9 Issue 10 2026 Page 3684-3701 https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I10-1717009
Onwughalu Markanthony Kenechi, Eseosa Omorogiuwa, Ehikhamenle Matthew "Machine Learning and M2M Communication in Smart Grids: A Review, Taxonomy, and Future Directions for Fault Management" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 9, no. 10, Apr. 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I10-1717009
Onwughalu Markanthony Kenechi, Eseosa Omorogiuwa, Ehikhamenle Matthew (2026). Machine Learning and M2M Communication in Smart Grids: A Review, Taxonomy, and Future Directions for Fault Management. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 9(10). doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I10-1717009
Onwughalu Markanthony Kenechi, Eseosa Omorogiuwa, Ehikhamenle Matthew "Machine Learning and M2M Communication in Smart Grids: A Review, Taxonomy, and Future Directions for Fault Management" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 9, no. 10, Apr. 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I10-1717009
@article{1717009,
      author = {Onwughalu Markanthony Kenechi, Eseosa Omorogiuwa, Ehikhamenle Matthew},
      title = {Machine Learning and M2M Communication in Smart Grids: A Review, Taxonomy, and Future Directions for Fault Management},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {9},
      number = {10},
      pages = {3684-3701},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1717009.pdf},
      abstract = {The transformation of power distribution systems toward smart grid architectures has intensified the need for intelligent, communication-aware, and resilient fault management solutions, particularly in developing-region networks where reliability indices remain critically constrained. While machine learning techniques have demonstrated transformative capabilities in fault detection and classification, achieving superior accuracy through deep graph learning, spatial-temporal recurrent neural networks, and hybrid artificial intelligence approaches, these studies predominantly operate under idealised communication assumptions that ignore the latency, jitter, and packet loss inherent in real-world machine-to-machine deployments. Conversely, existing machine-to-machine communication protocols for smart grids, including LoRaWAN, NB-IoT, and ZigBee, have been studied in isolation from the diagnostic algorithms they are intended to support. This critical disconnect between algorithm accuracy and deployment reality creates a significant gap in the literature: no unified framework currently exists to evaluate machine learning performance under realistic machine-to-machine communication constraints or to optimise communication parameters for diagnostic reliability.This paper presents a comprehensive review of machine learning and machine-to-machine communication integration for low-voltage and medium-voltage distribution fault management, structured around a novel taxonomy of communication-aware architectures. We systematically analyse existing approaches across four categories: communication-agnostic machine learning, communication-assisted diagnostics, communication-resilient algorithms, and fully integrated machine-to-machine machine learning systems. Through comparative analysis of verified literature spanning deep reinforcement learning for service restoration, multi-agent coordination for automated switching, and federated learning for distributed intelligence, we identify critical research gaps, including the absence of electrical-communication co-simulation platforms, underdeveloped edge-based inference architectures, and insufficient validation under non-independent and identically distributed data conditions. We further propose a unified conceptual framework integrating electrical feeder dynamics, machine-to-machine communication impairments, and machine learning inference within a coordinated architecture, validated against Nigerian distribution network parameters as a representative developing-region case study. By consolidating existing knowledge and highlighting the imperative for communication-machine learning co-design, this work provides clear directions for advancing intelligent, resilient, and deployable fault management systems in next-generation distribution networks.},
      keywords = {Machine-To-Machine Communication; Machine Learning; Fault Detection; Distribution Networks; Smart Grids; Communication-Aware Architectures; Co-Simulation; Developing Regions},
      month = {April},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I10-1717009}
  }