Home / Current Issue / Paper 1717221
From Land Scarcity to Spatial Abundance: Regulatory Reforms that Transformed Land Governance in Nigeria’s Oil and Gas Special Economic Zones (2015 – 2024)
Subject area: Arts, Social Sciences and Humanities · Area of research: Public Policy
DOI: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I11-1717221
Abstract
Land administration has remained one of the most critical determinants of the success or failure of Special Economic Zones (SEZs) globally. In Nigeria, the performance of Oil and Gas Special Economic Zones (OGSEZs) was historically constrained by land governance disputes, monopolistic lease arrangements, overlapping institutional mandates, bureaucratic bottlenecks, and weak coordination between federal and state authorities. This study examines the reforms introduced between 2015 and 2024 that transformed land governance within Nigeria’s Oil and Gas Free Zones from a system characterized by spatial restrictions and institutional ambiguity into a more decentralized and expansion-oriented governance framework. Using a mixed-methods research design, the study relied on qualitative interviews, documentary analysis, questionnaires, and policy review to evaluate the impact of reforms implemented by the Oil and Gas Free Zones Authority (OGFZA). The study adopted Stakeholder Theory and the Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) Framework as analytical foundations for examining the relationship between institutional reforms, stakeholder participation, and land access outcomes. Findings reveal that prior to 2015, land governance within the Oil and Gas Free Zones was dominated by restrictive lease structures and overlapping jurisdictional claims involving federal agencies, State Government and private concessionaires, however, reforms implemented between 2015 and 2024, including the introduction of Developer Licenses, Sub-Zone licensing frameworks, institutional clarifications, and the Oil and Gas Export Free Zone Regulations 2019, significantly expanded investor access to industrial land and improved land governance outcomes. The study revealed that the reforms contributed to an estimated spatial expansion growth of over 92.7% within the study period. The paper argues that sustainable industrial development within Nigeria’s oil and gas sector depends heavily on transparent land governance systems, institutional coordination, and legally secure land administration mechanisms. The study recommends harmonization of land governance laws, statutory clarification of institutional mandates, deployment of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) for land administration transparency, and stronger stakeholder participation frameworks for host communities and investors.
Keywords
Land Administration, Oil and Gas Free Zones, Special Economic Zones, Industrial Policy, Institutional Reforms.
References
[1] Bennett, R., Enemark, S., Wallace, J., & Williamson, I. (2022). Land administration for sustainable development. Routledge.
[2] Brown, T., & Martinez, R. (2022). Infrastructure governance and logistics systems in the global oil and gas industry. Energy Infrastructure Review, 9(1), 33–49.
[3] Enemark, S., McLaren, R., & Williamson, I. (2009). Land administration systems for sustainable development. ESRI Press.
[4] Farole, T. (2011). Special economic zones in Africa: Comparing performance and learning from global experiences. World Bank.
[5] Farole, T., & Akinci, G. (2011). Special economic zones: Progress, emerging challenges and future directions. World Bank.
[6] Federal Ministry of Industry, Trade and Investment. (2022). Assessment report on Nigeria’s oil and gas free zones. Abuja: Government Press.
[7] Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman Publishing.
[8] Johnson, M., Smith, T., & Williams, P. (2023). Environmental sustainability and energy transition challenges in the oil and gas industry. Global Energy Review, 15(4), 201–223.
[9] Li, H., & Zhang, W. (2024). Industrial clusters and SEZ competitiveness in emerging economies. International Journal of Industrial Policy, 21(1), 71–95.
[10] Mabogunje, A. L. (2011). Land reform and economic development in Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Economic and Social Studies, 53(2), 189–208.
[11] Natural Resource Governance Institute. (2015). Legal frameworks for resource governance. New York: NRGI.
[12] Nzerem, C., & Obe, O. (2016). A Review of Nigeria’s Free Trade Zone scheme. Lagos: Commercial Law Publishers.
[13] Okafor, E., & Ibrahim, M. (2023). Community resistance and industrial land acquisition challenges in Nigeria’s Special Economic Zones. Journal of African Development Policy, 14(2), 112–129.
[14] Olawale, T., & Adebayo, K. (2023). Oil dependence and economic diversification challenges in Nigeria. Nigerian Economic Review, 10(1), 52–74.
[15] Ostrom, E. (2005). Understanding institutional diversity. Princeton University Press.
[16] United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). (2019). World investment report 2019: Special economic zones. United Nations.
[17] United Nations Committee of Experts on Global Geospatial Information Management (UN-GGIM). (2020). Framework for effective land administration. United Nations.
[18] Ugonabo, C., Egolum, P., & Sado, A. (2023). Land policy and socioeconomic development in Nigeria. Journal of Land Policy Studies, 7(3), 55–73.
[19] Williamson, I., Enemark, S., Wallace, J., & Rajabifard, A. (2010). Land administration for sustainable development. ESRI Press.
[20] Zeng, D. Z. (2011). How do special economic zones and industrial clusters drive China’s rapid development? World Bank Policy Research Working Paper
How to cite this paper
@article{1717221,
author = {Morgan Uzoigwe C. Mmahi, Prof. Abdullahi Yahaya Adadu, Assoc. Prof. Canice E. Erunke},
title = {From Land Scarcity to Spatial Abundance: Regulatory Reforms that Transformed Land Governance in Nigeria’s Oil and Gas Special Economic Zones (2015 – 2024)},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {9},
number = {11},
pages = {69-77},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1717221.pdf},
abstract = {Land administration has remained one of the most critical determinants of the success or failure of Special Economic Zones (SEZs) globally. In Nigeria, the performance of Oil and Gas Special Economic Zones (OGSEZs) was historically constrained by land governance disputes, monopolistic lease arrangements, overlapping institutional mandates, bureaucratic bottlenecks, and weak coordination between federal and state authorities. This study examines the reforms introduced between 2015 and 2024 that transformed land governance within Nigeria’s Oil and Gas Free Zones from a system characterized by spatial restrictions and institutional ambiguity into a more decentralized and expansion-oriented governance framework. Using a mixed-methods research design, the study relied on qualitative interviews, documentary analysis, questionnaires, and policy review to evaluate the impact of reforms implemented by the Oil and Gas Free Zones Authority (OGFZA). The study adopted Stakeholder Theory and the Institutional Analysis and Development (IAD) Framework as analytical foundations for examining the relationship between institutional reforms, stakeholder participation, and land access outcomes. Findings reveal that prior to 2015, land governance within the Oil and Gas Free Zones was dominated by restrictive lease structures and overlapping jurisdictional claims involving federal agencies, State Government and private concessionaires, however, reforms implemented between 2015 and 2024, including the introduction of Developer Licenses, Sub-Zone licensing frameworks, institutional clarifications, and the Oil and Gas Export Free Zone Regulations 2019, significantly expanded investor access to industrial land and improved land governance outcomes. The study revealed that the reforms contributed to an estimated spatial expansion growth of over 92.7% within the study period. The paper argues that sustainable industrial development within Nigeria’s oil and gas sector depends heavily on transparent land governance systems, institutional coordination, and legally secure land administration mechanisms. The study recommends harmonization of land governance laws, statutory clarification of institutional mandates, deployment of Geographic Information Systems (GIS) for land administration transparency, and stronger stakeholder participation frameworks for host communities and investors.},
keywords = {Land Administration, Oil and Gas Free Zones, Special Economic Zones, Industrial Policy, Institutional Reforms.},
month = {May},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I11-1717221}
}