Home / Current Issue / Paper 1717265
Strategies to Reduce Work-Related Injuries in the Saudi Manufacturing Sector
Subject area: Management and Commerce · Area of research: Workplace Safety in Manufacturing
DOI: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I11-1717265
Abstract
Work-related injuries remain a material operational, social, and policy concern in Saudi Arabia as the Kingdom expands advanced manufacturing under Vision 2030. Manufacturing combines high-energy machinery, manual material handling, shift work, chemical exposure, maintenance tasks, contractor interfaces, and a diverse workforce, making injury prevention a multi-causal governance problem rather than a narrow compliance issue. This review paper synthesizes recent literature published between 2020 and 2026, together with current Saudi policy and statistical sources, to identify actionable strategies for reducing work-related injuries in the Saudi manufacturing sector. The review adopts a structured narrative approach modeled on public-health and occupational-safety review formats, emphasizing burden identification, risk-factor synthesis, intervention mapping, and framework development. The synthesis shows that the Saudi context is shaped by five interacting conditions: rapid industrial expansion, uneven occupational safety maturity across firms, the concentration of injuries among male and migrant workers, persistent exposure to struck-by, caught-in, fall, and ergonomic hazards, and growing heat risk in outdoor-adjacent and non-climate-controlled work environments. Evidence further indicates that isolated training or PPE campaigns are insufficient when not supported by safer design, supervision quality, inspection capacity, near-miss learning, and reliable leading indicators. In response, the paper proposes a Saudi Manufacturing Injury Reduction Framework that integrates hierarchy-of-controls thinking, ISO 45001-oriented management systems, multilingual competency assurance, ergonomics, heat governance, contractor control, digital monitoring, and integrated surveillance. The review argues that the most effective strategy is not a single intervention but a coordinated system that aligns engineering controls, worker participation, regulatory enforcement, and production governance. The paper concludes that injury reduction should be treated as a productivity and resilience agenda, not only a legal or humanitarian obligation, and that Saudi manufacturing can improve injury outcomes substantially by moving from reactive incident response to data-driven prevention. The novelty of this review lies in its manufacturing-specific focus within Saudi Arabia, its integration of regulatory, operational, ergonomic, and digital safety dimensions, and its proposed Saudi Manufacturing Injury Reduction Framework tailored to local industrial conditions including migrant labor, Gulf heat, contractor interfaces, and industrial-city expansion. This study makes a novel contribution by integrating occupational safety, process safety, and sector-specific risks (feed, glucose, and poultry industries) into a unified framework tailored to Saudi Arabia’s industrial transformation context.
Keywords
Occupational Injuries; Saudi Arabia; Manufacturing; Safety Climate; Ergonomics; ISO 45001; Heat Stress; Worker Participation; Injury Prevention; Review Paper
References
[1] Abdel Razik, M., Altuwayhir, A. K., Almihmadi, M. K., Alkhaldi, A. A., Alqudeebi, S. K., Alghamdi, M. A., Alsaiari, A. A., Aldosari, Z. F., & Alamer, A. M. (2022). Pattern of traumatic occupational injuries in Saudi Arabia: A cross-sectional study. Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care, 11(12), 7907-7912.
[2] Almuhaidib, I. A., Saleh, M., Abdullah, F. M., & Ramadan, M. Z. (2025). Occupational injuries in Saudi Arabia during the period from 2016 to 2018. Journal of Engineering Research. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jer.2025.11.003
[3] Bondebjerg, A., Filges, T., Pejtersen, J. H., Kildemoes, M. W., Burr, H., Hasle, P., Tompa, E., & Bengtsen, E. (2023). Occupational health and safety regulatory interventions to improve the work environment: An evidence and gap map of effectiveness studies. Campbell Systematic Reviews, 19(4), e1371. https://doi.org/10.1002/cl2.1371
[4] Chan, V. C. H., Ross, G. B., Kobrzycka, A., & Clouthier, A. L. (2022). The role of machine learning in the primary prevention of work-related musculoskeletal disorders: A scoping review. Applied Ergonomics, 99, 103574.
[5] Dabkowski, E., Burdon, S., & Salmon, P. M. (2025). Systemic factors in workplace accidents: An umbrella review. Heliyon, 11, e6722.
[6] da Silva, J. M., Bornia, A. C., da Silva, J. M. N., & Fernandes, R. S. (2026). Determinants of safety climate in industrial settings: A systematic review of measurement instruments. Healthcare, 14(5), 596. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare14050596
[7] Dodoo, J. E., Al-Samarraie, H., Alzahrani, A. I., Lonsdale, M., & Alalwan, N. (2024). Digital innovations for occupational safety: Empowering workers in hazardous environments. Workplace Health & Safety, 72(3), 84-95. https://doi.org/10.1177/21650799231215811
[8] GASTAT. (2025). Health and safety at workplace statistics 2024. General Authority for Statistics.
[9] Greggi, C., Fronterre, M., Galli, F., & colleagues. (2024). Work-related musculoskeletal disorders: A systematic review. Journal of Clinical Medicine, 13(13), 3964.
[10] Guo, X., and colleagues. (2025). Impact of heat exposure on workers' health and safety: A scoping review. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 82(11), 563-572.
[11] International Labour Organization. (2022a). A safe and healthy working environment is a fundamental principle and right at work.
[12] International Labour Organization. (2022b). The fundamental conventions on occupational safety and health. ILO.
[13] International Organization for Standardization. (2023). ISO 45001:2018 - Occupational health and safety management systems - Requirements with guidance for use.
[14] International Organization for Standardization. (2024). ISO 45000 family - Occupational health and safety.
[15] Jiang, L., Zhang, J., & Wong, Y. D. (2024). Digital technology in occupational health of manufacturing industries: A systematic literature review. Discover Applied Sciences, 6, 631. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42452-024-06349-4
[16] Jilcha, K. (2023). Vision Zero for industrial workplace safety innovative model development for metal manufacturing industry. Heliyon, 9(11), e21504. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e21504
[17] Kabiesz, P., and colleagues. (2025). Modern technologies in occupational health and safety training. Sustainability, 17(16), 7305.
[18] Kuricová, A., and colleagues. (2025). An innovative approach to occupational risk assessment in OHS: A case study on the verification of the ALrisk model in manufacturing enterprises in Slovakia. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 22(5), 757.
[19] Min, J., and colleagues. (2024). Association between the safety climate and occupational injuries among workers. Frontiers in Public Health, 12, 1455440.
[20] Ministry of Human Resources and Social Development. (2025a). Progress in the Saudi labor market.
[21] Ministry of Human Resources and Social Development. (2025b). Health and safety in the work environment.
[22] Mwera, I. C., and colleagues. (2025). Work-related injuries and occupational safety practices among factory workers. SAGE Open Medicine, 13, 20503121251385675.
[23] Nastasia, I., & Rives, R. (2025). Successful strategies for occupational health and safety in small and medium enterprises: Insights for a sustainable return to work. Journal of Occupational Rehabilitation. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10926-024-10255-2
[24] National Council for Occupational Safety and Health. (2025a). Home. https://www.ncosh.gov.sa/en/home/
[25] National Council for Occupational Safety and Health. (2025b). Regulation on the organization of work in high-risk occupations.
[26] Nath, A., and colleagues. (2026). An umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses on occupational heat exposure, health risks, and productivity losses globally. Current Environmental Health Reports.
[27] Occupational Safety and Health Administration. (2023). Safety management: A safe workplace is sound business.
[28] Pedrosa, M. H., Salazar, A. K., Cardoso, C., & Guedes, C. (2025). Study on safety culture following the implementation of a near-miss management system in the traditional manufacturing industry. Safety, 11(1), 23.
[29] Podrecca, M., and colleagues. (2024). The impact of ISO 45001 on firms' performance: An empirical analysis. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 31(5), 4581-4595.
[30] Sadeghi, H., Mohandes, S. R., Yunusa-Kaltungo, A., Cheung, C., & Manu, P. (2025). A state-of-the-art review of safety leading indicators across diverse industries. Journal of Safety Science and Resilience, 100272. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnlssr.2025.100272
[31] Santos, W., Lorente, A., Rojas, C., Mariscal, G., & Lorente, R. (2025). Impact of personal protective equipment in preventing occupational injuries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Frontiers in Public Health, 13, 1720363. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2025.1720363
[32] Saudi Vision 2030. (2025). Overview. https://www.vision2030.gov.sa/en/overview
[33] Schubert, M., Bolm-Audorff, U., Andersen, J. H., Petereit-Haack, G., Reissig, D., & Seidler, A. (2026). Scoping review on the effect of labour inspections on occupational health and safety: A meta-analytic update. Journal of Occupational Medicine and Toxicology, 21, 5.
[34] Seidu, R. K., and colleagues. (2024). A systematic review of work-related health problems of factory workers in the textile and fashion industry. Journal of Occupational Health, 66(1), uiae007.
[35] Shabani, S., Bachwenkizi, J., Mamuya, S. H., & Moen, B. E. (2024). The prevalence of occupational injuries and associated risk factors among workers in iron and steel industries: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BMC Public Health, 24, 111.
[36] Vitrano, G., & Micheli, G. J. L. (2024). Effectiveness of occupational safety and health interventions: A long way to go. Frontiers in Public Health, 12, 1292692. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpubh.2024.1292692
[37] WHO. (2025a). Climate change and workplace heat stress: Technical report. World Health Organization.
[38] WHO. (2025b). Workplace heat stress. World Health Organization.
[39] WHO & World Meteorological Organization. (2025). WHO, WMO issue new report and guidance to protect workers from increasing heat stress.
How to cite this paper
@article{1717265,
author = {Mohammad Hasan Hussain, Muhammad Zaid, Tasleem Ahmad, Fares Farid Abdullah Alferdaws},
title = {Strategies to Reduce Work-Related Injuries in the Saudi Manufacturing Sector},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {9},
number = {11},
pages = {824-838},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1717265.pdf},
abstract = {Work-related injuries remain a material operational, social, and policy concern in Saudi Arabia as the Kingdom expands advanced manufacturing under Vision 2030. Manufacturing combines high-energy machinery, manual material handling, shift work, chemical exposure, maintenance tasks, contractor interfaces, and a diverse workforce, making injury prevention a multi-causal governance problem rather than a narrow compliance issue. This review paper synthesizes recent literature published between 2020 and 2026, together with current Saudi policy and statistical sources, to identify actionable strategies for reducing work-related injuries in the Saudi manufacturing sector. The review adopts a structured narrative approach modeled on public-health and occupational-safety review formats, emphasizing burden identification, risk-factor synthesis, intervention mapping, and framework development. The synthesis shows that the Saudi context is shaped by five interacting conditions: rapid industrial expansion, uneven occupational safety maturity across firms, the concentration of injuries among male and migrant workers, persistent exposure to struck-by, caught-in, fall, and ergonomic hazards, and growing heat risk in outdoor-adjacent and non-climate-controlled work environments. Evidence further indicates that isolated training or PPE campaigns are insufficient when not supported by safer design, supervision quality, inspection capacity, near-miss learning, and reliable leading indicators. In response, the paper proposes a Saudi Manufacturing Injury Reduction Framework that integrates hierarchy-of-controls thinking, ISO 45001-oriented management systems, multilingual competency assurance, ergonomics, heat governance, contractor control, digital monitoring, and integrated surveillance. The review argues that the most effective strategy is not a single intervention but a coordinated system that aligns engineering controls, worker participation, regulatory enforcement, and production governance. The paper concludes that injury reduction should be treated as a productivity and resilience agenda, not only a legal or humanitarian obligation, and that Saudi manufacturing can improve injury outcomes substantially by moving from reactive incident response to data-driven prevention. The novelty of this review lies in its manufacturing-specific focus within Saudi Arabia, its integration of regulatory, operational, ergonomic, and digital safety dimensions, and its proposed Saudi Manufacturing Injury Reduction Framework tailored to local industrial conditions including migrant labor, Gulf heat, contractor interfaces, and industrial-city expansion. This study makes a novel contribution by integrating occupational safety, process safety, and sector-specific risks (feed, glucose, and poultry industries) into a unified framework tailored to Saudi Arabia’s industrial transformation context.},
keywords = {Occupational Injuries; Saudi Arabia; Manufacturing; Safety Climate; Ergonomics; ISO 45001; Heat Stress; Worker Participation; Injury Prevention; Review Paper},
month = {May},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I11-1717265}
}