International Peer-Reviewed JournalOpen AccessISSN 2456-8880
irejournals@gmail.com+91-7433024337

Home / Current Issue / Paper 1717476

1717476 Vol 9 · Issue 11 Download Paper

Bank-Specific Attributes and Earnings Management in Nigerian Deposit Money Banks: The Moderating Role of Fintech Adoption

Rita Okonkwo

Subject area: Management and Commerce  ·  Area of research: Financial Technology

DOI: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I11-1717476

Abstract

This study examines whether bank-specific attributes influence earnings management in Nigerian deposit money banks and whether fintech intensity alters that relationship. Using a balanced panel of 50 bank-year observations drawn from five leading Nigerian banks Access Bank, First Bank, GTCO, UBA and Zenith Bank over 2015-2024, the study estimates bank fixed-effects regressions with heteroskedasticity-robust (HC3) standard errors. The empirical design uses two pre-computed earnings-management proxies supplied in the dataset (EM1 and EM2) to reduce dependence on a single measure. Bank-specific attributes are represented by bank size, leverage, capital ratio, profitability and loan intensity, while fintech intensity captures the extent of digital-finance adoption. Because leverage and capital ratio are mechanically collinear in the sample, the study estimates alternative specifications rather than forcing both ratios into the same model. The results show that bank-specific attributes jointly explain earnings management in the Nigerian banking context, with the strongest and most stable effect coming from bank size. Larger banks exhibit significantly higher values of both earnings-management proxies, while leverage is negatively associated with earnings management and capital ratio is positively associated with it when each is estimated in a separate specification. Profitability and loan intensity do not display robust standalone effects. Fintech intensity has a statistically insignificant direct association with earnings management, and the interaction terms between fintech intensity and the bank-specific attributes are uniformly insignificant. The evidence therefore suggests that, within the study window, fintech adoption in Nigerian deposit money banks has not yet matured into a sufficiently strong monitoring technology to systematically discipline earnings management. The paper contributes to the earnings-management literature by integrating banking attributes with digital transformation, by providing Nigeria-specific evidence grounded in actual bank-year data, and by showing that digitalization should not be assumed to automatically improve reporting discipline without complementary governance, risk and reporting controls.

Keywords

Earnings Management, Fintech Intensity, Bank Size, Leverage, Capital Ratio, Profitability, Loan Intensity, Nigerian Deposit Money Banks

References

[1] Ajekwe, C. C., Ibiamke, A., & Silas, M. F. (2017). Loan loss provisions, earnings smoothing and capital management under IFRS: The case of deposit money banks in Nigeria. American Journal of Management Science and Engineering, 2(4), 58–64.

[2] Ashiru, O., Balogun, G., & Paseda, O. (2023). Financial innovation and bank financial performance: Evidence from Nigerian deposit money banks. Research in Globalization, 6, 100120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resglo.2023.100120

[3] Athanasoglou, P. P., Brissimis, S. N., & Delis, M. D. (2008). Bank-specific, industry-specific and macroeconomic determinants of bank profitability. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 18(2), 121–136.

[4] Banna, H., Hassan, M. K., & Rashid, M. (2021). Fintech-based financial inclusion and bank risk-taking: Evidence from OIC countries. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 75, 101447.

[5] Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120.

[6] Beatty, A., & Liao, S. (2014). Financial accounting in the banking industry: A review of the empirical literature. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58(2–3), 339–383.

[7] Beatty, A. L., Ke, B., & Petroni, K. R. (2002). Earnings management to avoid earnings declines across publicly and privately held banks. The Accounting Review, 77(3), 547–570. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2002.77.3.547

[8] Beaver, W. H., & Engel, E. E. (1996). Discretionary behavior with respect to allowances for loan losses and the behavior of security prices. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 22(1–3), 177–206. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(96)00428-4

[9] Bollaert, H., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., & Schwienbacher, A. (2021). Fintech and access to finance. Journal of Corporate Finance, 68, 101941.

[10] Cheng, M., & Qu, Y. (2020). Does bank fintech reduce credit risk? Evidence from China. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 63, 101398.

[11] Dechow, P. M., & Skinner, D. J. (2000). Earnings management: Reconciling the views of accounting academics, practitioners and regulators. Accounting Horizons, 14(2), 235–250.

[12] Dietrich, A., & Wanzenried, G. (2011). Determinants of bank profitability before and during the crisis: Evidence from Switzerland. Journal of International Financial Markets, Institutions and Money, 21(3), 307–327.

[13] Fonseca, A. R., & González, F. (2008). Cross-country determinants of bank income smoothing by managing loan-loss provisions. Journal of Banking & Finance, 32(2), 217–228.

[14] Healy, P. M., & Wahlen, J. M. (1999). A review of the earnings management literature and its implications for standard setting. Accounting Horizons, 13(4), 365–383. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.1999.13.4.365

[15] Ibrahim, I., Adamu, B. S., Uthman, F. Z., & Abba, H. I. (2022). Effect of firm attributes on earnings management of deposit money banks in Nigeria. FUOYE Journal of Finance and Contemporary Issues, 3(2), 164–182.

[16] Jensen, M. C., & Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4), 305–360.

[17] Lee, C.-C., Li, X., Yu, C.-H., & Zhao, J. (2021). Does fintech innovation improve bank efficiency? Evidence from China’s banking industry. International Review of Economics & Finance, 74, 468–483.

[18] Li, C., He, S., Tian, Y., Sun, S., & Ning, L. (2022). Does the bank’s fintech innovation reduce its risk-taking? Evidence from China’s banking industry. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7, 100219.

[19] NIBSS. (2026, February 3). Instant payment transactions rise by 120% in 2yrs—CBN. Nigeria Inter-Bank Settlement System.

[20] Ozili, P. K. (2018). Impact of digital finance on financial inclusion and stability. Borsa Istanbul Review, 18(4), 329–340. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.bir.2017.12.003

[21] Salami, A. A., & Uthman, A. B. (2024). Bank capital, earnings smoothing and provisioning practices in Nigeria: IFRS and risk evidence. Asian Journal of Economics and Banking, 8(2), 267–293. https://doi.org/10.1108/AJEB-05-2022-0058

[22] Samuel-Ogbu, I. (2022). Digital technology and the transformation of the Nigerian banking system: The operators’ perspective. CBN Economic and Financial Review, 60(4), 133–150.

[23] Trujillo-Ponce, A. (2013). What determines the profitability of banks? Evidence from Spain. Accounting & Finance, 53(2), 561–586.

[24] Vives, X. (2022). The impact of the FinTech revolution on the future of banking: Opportunities and risks. Journal of Banking & Finance, 145, 106581.

[25] Wen, H., Fang, J., & Gao, H. (2023). How FinTech improves financial reporting quality? Evidence from earnings management. Economic Modelling, 126, 106435. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.econmod.2023.106435

[26] Xu, F., Kasperskaya, Y., & Sagarra, M. (2025). The impact of FinTech on bank performance: A systematic literature review. Digital Business, 5(2), 100131. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.digbus.2025.100131

[27] Zhan, W., & Jing, H. (2022). Does fintech development reduce corporate earnings management? Evidence from China. Sustainability, 14(24), 16647. https://doi.org/10.3390/su142416647

How to cite this paper

Rita Okonkwo "Bank-Specific Attributes and Earnings Management in Nigerian Deposit Money Banks: The Moderating Role of Fintech Adoption" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 9 Issue 11 2026 Page 1103-1118 https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I11-1717476
Rita Okonkwo "Bank-Specific Attributes and Earnings Management in Nigerian Deposit Money Banks: The Moderating Role of Fintech Adoption" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 9, no. 11, May. 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I11-1717476
Rita Okonkwo (2026). Bank-Specific Attributes and Earnings Management in Nigerian Deposit Money Banks: The Moderating Role of Fintech Adoption. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 9(11). doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I11-1717476
Rita Okonkwo "Bank-Specific Attributes and Earnings Management in Nigerian Deposit Money Banks: The Moderating Role of Fintech Adoption" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 9, no. 11, May. 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I11-1717476
@article{1717476,
      author = {Rita Okonkwo},
      title = {Bank-Specific Attributes and Earnings Management in Nigerian Deposit Money Banks: The Moderating Role of Fintech Adoption},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {9},
      number = {11},
      pages = {1103-1118},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1717476.pdf},
      abstract = {This study examines whether bank-specific attributes influence earnings management in Nigerian deposit money banks and whether fintech intensity alters that relationship. Using a balanced panel of 50 bank-year observations drawn from five leading Nigerian banks Access Bank, First Bank, GTCO, UBA and Zenith Bank over 2015-2024, the study estimates bank fixed-effects regressions with heteroskedasticity-robust (HC3) standard errors. The empirical design uses two pre-computed earnings-management proxies supplied in the dataset (EM1 and EM2) to reduce dependence on a single measure. Bank-specific attributes are represented by bank size, leverage, capital ratio, profitability and loan intensity, while fintech intensity captures the extent of digital-finance adoption. Because leverage and capital ratio are mechanically collinear in the sample, the study estimates alternative specifications rather than forcing both ratios into the same model. The results show that bank-specific attributes jointly explain earnings management in the Nigerian banking context, with the strongest and most stable effect coming from bank size. Larger banks exhibit significantly higher values of both earnings-management proxies, while leverage is negatively associated with earnings management and capital ratio is positively associated with it when each is estimated in a separate specification. Profitability and loan intensity do not display robust standalone effects. Fintech intensity has a statistically insignificant direct association with earnings management, and the interaction terms between fintech intensity and the bank-specific attributes are uniformly insignificant. The evidence therefore suggests that, within the study window, fintech adoption in Nigerian deposit money banks has not yet matured into a sufficiently strong monitoring technology to systematically discipline earnings management. The paper contributes to the earnings-management literature by integrating banking attributes with digital transformation, by providing Nigeria-specific evidence grounded in actual bank-year data, and by showing that digitalization should not be assumed to automatically improve reporting discipline without complementary governance, risk and reporting controls.},
      keywords = {Earnings Management, Fintech Intensity, Bank Size, Leverage, Capital Ratio, Profitability, Loan Intensity, Nigerian Deposit Money Banks},
      month = {May},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I11-1717476}
  }