Home / Current Issue / Paper 1717796
Legal Protection against Non-Consensual Deepfake Content in India
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Law
DOI: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I11-1717796
Abstract
This dissertation focuses on the newly emerged phenomenon of deepfakes and its intricate legal aspects, analyzing it mostly through the Indian legal system and a comparative perspective of how the legal systems of different countries operate. Deepfakes are generated with the help of the latest artificial intelligence methods, including Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), and allow producing highly realistic and fake audio-visual content, which is associated with grave concerns regarding privacy, reputational concerns, misinformation, and democratic integrity. The paper starts by discussing the conceptual and technological background of deepfakes, their development and the different types and uses of them in entertainment, politics, and cybercrime. It also harshly evaluates the dangers of deepfakes, such as identity theft, defamation, non-consensual explicit content, and mass-disinformation campaigns. The study also assesses the moral issues and social implications of the abuse of such technology. The dissertation dedicates a considerable portion to the analysis of the sufficiency of the current Indian legislation such as the Information Technology Act, 2000, the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023, to deal with harms caused by deepfakes. It further takes into account intermediary liability in the context of the Information Technology Rules, 2021, and examines the judicial cases that influence the discussion of the privacy and free speech in the digital era. The paper singles out regulatory issues including lack of specific legislation on deepfakes, technological constraints in the detection process, jurisdictional issues, and the conflict between freedom of speech and regulation. In order to give a broader picture, a comparative review of the legal systems in other countries like the United States, European Union and the United Kingdom is also conducted with a focus on best practice and trends in regulation. The dissertation ends by suggesting legal and policy recommendations such as the necessity of specialized legal framework, greater platform responsibility, enhancing technological detection systems, and global collaboration. It stresses the need to adopt a balanced strategy that does not only protect basic rights but also effectively deals with the menace of deepfake technology in an ever-digitalized society.
Keywords
Deepfakes, Artificial Intelligence, Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), Cybercrime, Identity Theft, Defamation, Misinformation, Digital Privacy, Intermediary Liability, Information Technology Act, 2000 Information Technology Act, 2000, Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023, Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023
References
[1] Stuart Russell and Peter N0rvig, Artificial Intelligence: A M0dern Appr0ach (4th edn, Pears0n 2021).
[2] Nigel Smart, Crypt0graphy Made Simple (Springer 2016).
[3] Chris Reed, Making Laws f0r Cyberspace (0xf0rd University Press 2012).
[4] Ian Walden, C0mputer Crimes and Digital Investigati0ns (0xf0rd University Press 2016).
[5] Tal Zarsky, Privacy and Data Pr0tecti0n in the Digital Age (Cambridge University Press 2020).
[6] Daniel J. S0l0ve, Understanding Privacy (Harvard University Press 2008).
[7] Paul Bernal, Internet Privacy Rights (Cambridge University Press 2014).
[8] Vivek S00d, Cyber Law Simplified (McGraw Hill 2020).
[9] Justice Yatindra Singh, Cyber Laws (Universal Law Publishing 2012).
[10] J0nathan Herring, Criminal Law: Text, Cases and Materials (0xf0rd University Press 2022).
[11] W0rld Ec0n0mic F0rum, Gl0bal Risks Rep0rt (2020–2024).
[12] NITI Aay0g, Nati0nal Strategy f0r Artificial Intelligence (2018).
[13] UNESC0, Rec0mmendati0n 0n the Ethics 0f Artificial Intelligence (2021).
[14] Eur0pean C0mmissi0n, White Paper 0n Artificial Intelligence (2020).
[15] 0ECD, Principles 0n Artificial Intelligence (2019).
[16] Deeptrace Labs, The State 0f Deepfakes (2019).
[17] Interp0l, Gl0bal Crime Trend Rep0rt (2020).
[18] Br00kings Instituti0n, AI and G0vernance Rep0rts (2021).
[19] Carnegie India, AI G0vernance in India (2022).
[20] Internet Freed0m F0undati0n, Rep0rts 0n intermediary liability and digital rights.
[21] Justice K.S. Puttaswamy v. Uni0n 0f India.
[22] Shreya Singhal v. Uni0n 0f India.
[23] Anvar P.V. v. P.K. Basheer.
[24] Karmanya Singh Sareen v. Uni0n 0f India.
[25] G00gle India Pvt. Ltd. v. Visaka Industries.
[26] Ministry 0f Electr0nics and Inf0rmati0n Techn0l0gy – https://www.meity.g0v.in
[27] Press Inf0rmati0n Bureau – https://pib.g0v.in
[28] Supreme C0urt 0f India – https://main.sci.g0v.in
[29] Eur0pean C0mmissi0n – https://ec.eur0pa.eu
[30] Federal Trade C0mmissi0n – https://www.ftc.g0v
[31] NASSC0M – https://nassc0m.in
How to cite this paper
@article{1717796,
author = {Divika Uppal},
title = {Legal Protection against Non-Consensual Deepfake Content in India},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {9},
number = {11},
pages = {1246-1251},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1717796.pdf},
abstract = {This dissertation focuses on the newly emerged phenomenon of deepfakes and its intricate legal aspects, analyzing it mostly through the Indian legal system and a comparative perspective of how the legal systems of different countries operate. Deepfakes are generated with the help of the latest artificial intelligence methods, including Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), and allow producing highly realistic and fake audio-visual content, which is associated with grave concerns regarding privacy, reputational concerns, misinformation, and democratic integrity. The paper starts by discussing the conceptual and technological background of deepfakes, their development and the different types and uses of them in entertainment, politics, and cybercrime. It also harshly evaluates the dangers of deepfakes, such as identity theft, defamation, non-consensual explicit content, and mass-disinformation campaigns. The study also assesses the moral issues and social implications of the abuse of such technology. The dissertation dedicates a considerable portion to the analysis of the sufficiency of the current Indian legislation such as the Information Technology Act, 2000, the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023, and the Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023, to deal with harms caused by deepfakes. It further takes into account intermediary liability in the context of the Information Technology Rules, 2021, and examines the judicial cases that influence the discussion of the privacy and free speech in the digital era. The paper singles out regulatory issues including lack of specific legislation on deepfakes, technological constraints in the detection process, jurisdictional issues, and the conflict between freedom of speech and regulation. In order to give a broader picture, a comparative review of the legal systems in other countries like the United States, European Union and the United Kingdom is also conducted with a focus on best practice and trends in regulation. The dissertation ends by suggesting legal and policy recommendations such as the necessity of specialized legal framework, greater platform responsibility, enhancing technological detection systems, and global collaboration. It stresses the need to adopt a balanced strategy that does not only protect basic rights but also effectively deals with the menace of deepfake technology in an ever-digitalized society.},
keywords = {Deepfakes, Artificial Intelligence, Generative Adversarial Networks (GANs), Cybercrime, Identity Theft, Defamation, Misinformation, Digital Privacy, Intermediary Liability, Information Technology Act, 2000 Information Technology Act, 2000, Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023 Digital Personal Data Protection Act, 2023, Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023},
month = {May},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I11-1717796}
}