Home / Current Issue / Paper 1718060
The Hidden Risk: AI Without Governance Is the Next Financial Crisis
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Artificial Intelligence
DOI: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I11-1718060
Abstract
Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been revolutionizing the global financial system with its various applications, such as predictive analytics, automated trading, credit scoring, fraud detection, and algorithmic risk management. These innovations increase operational efficiency and market responsiveness, but they create a new category of vulnerability at systemic level that can lead to systemic financial instability, in the absence of adequate governance structures. This article explores the threat posed by AI systems, which, if not properly managed and controlled, could be a catalyst for the next financial crisis. The study examines the potential effects of opaque algorithms, over-automated systems, biased decision-making, data manipulation and co-ordinated AI systems within financial infrastructures on increasing volatility and diminishing accountability of institutions. Previous research shows that AI systems can amplify contagion effects, exacerbate speculative trading, and provide false trading signals without transparency, ethical regulation and regulation coordination (Danielsson & Uthemann, 2025; Singh et al., 2025). Moreover, as predictive AI models gain traction in the banking and investment industry, there are governance risks regarding explainability, cybersecurity, accountability, and centralizing technological power (Feldman & Stein, 2022; Fritz-Morgenthal et al., 2022). The article also reviews the governance lessons learned from the 2008 financial crisis, and highlights the fact that many of these issues are repeating themselves in the AI-powered financial ecosystems (Kathy, 2025; Goldin & Vogel, 2010). Furthermore, the study assesses ongoing international policy and regulatory responses, as well as financial institutions' and regulators' AI governance frameworks. The results indicate that the following elements are essential for good AI governance: clear algorithms, rules for responsible use of AI, cooperation between nations' regulations, ongoing auditing processes, and structures that put humans in the driver's seat. If these protections are not in place, AI could become a new threat to the financial system, rather than just a financial innovation tool, potentially threatening global markets. The article summarizes and explains that governance needs to keep up with the technological innovation if AI is not to be a threat to financial stability.
Keywords
Artificial Intelligence, AI Governance, Financial Crisis, Systemic Risk, Algorithmic Accountability, Financial Stability, Risk Management, Predictive Analytics, Regulatory Frameworks
References
[1] Danielsson, J., & Uthemann, A. (2025). Artificial intelligence and financial crises. Journal of Financial Stability, 101453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfs.2025.101453.
[2] Feldman, R., & Stein, K. (2022). AI governance in the financial industry. Stan. JL Bus. & Fin., 27, 94.
[3] Goldin, I. and Vogel, T. (2010), Global Governance and Systemic Risk in the 21st Century: Lessons from the Financial Crisis. Global Policy, 1: 4-15. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1758-5899.2009.00011.x
[4] Khalid, S., & Shahzad, I. (2025). Investigating the Role of Artificial Intelligence in Predicting Financial Crises and Enhancing Risk Management in Global Markets. Journal of Strategic Business Research, 3(2), 37-54. https://jsbrjournal.com/index.php/journal/article/view/54
[5] Zekos, G.I. (2021). AI Risk Management. In: Economics and Law of Artificial Intelligence. Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64254-9_6
[6] Kathy, S. (2025). Financial Crises Revisited: Governance Lessons from 2008 for Today's Economy. Available at SSRN 5613771 http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5613771
[7] Singh, S., Rahman, A., Johl, S.K. (2025). The Looming Labyrinth: Risks of Artificial Intelligence in Financial Sector. In: Akhtar, S., Alam, M., Wani, N.U.H., Jafar, S.H. (eds) Green Horizons. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-96-6495-5_12
[8] Yanney, A. A. S. (2025). Redefining corporate financial governance through AI-Powered predictive models for global business risk management. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, 2(6), 25-49.
[9] Cheatham, B., Javanmardian, K., & Samandari, H. (2019). Confronting the risks of artificial intelligence. McKinsey Quarterly, 2(38), 1-9.
[10] Bloch, D. A. (2025). False Findings in Finance: The Hidden Costs of Misleading Results in the Age of AI. Available at SSRN 5345109.
[11] Fritz-Morgenthal S, Hein B and Papenbrock J (2022) Financial Risk Management and Explainable, Trustworthy, Responsible AI. Front. Artif. Intell. 5:779799. doi: 10.3389/frai.2022.779799
[12] Hlatshwayo, M. A. (2025). Securing the Algorithmic Public Square: Artificial Intelligence, Social Media, and the Hidden Cybersecurity Governance Crisis. Zenodo.
[13] Leslie, D., & Perini, A. M. (2024). Future Shock: Generative AI and the international AI policy and governance crisis. Harvard Data Science Review, (Special Issue 5). https://doi.org/10.1162/99608f92.88b4cc98
[14] Santunu Barua. (2025). Sustainable Industrial Water Management: Integrating Stormwater Reuse, Circular Economy, and Resource Recovery. British Journal of Environmental Studies, 5(3), 08-22. https://doi.org/10.32996/bjes.2025.5.3.2
[15] Vyas, A. (2025). Revolutionizing risk: The role of artificial intelligence in financial risk management, forecasting, and global implementation. Forecasting, and Global Implementation (April 21, 2025).
[16] Barua, S. MICROPLASTICS IN URBAN RUNOFF AND WASTEWATER: SOURCES, TRANSPORT, AND ADVANCED REMOVAL TECHNOLOGIES. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18772537
[17] Videgaray, L., Aghion, P., Caputo, B., Forrest, T., Korinek, A., Langenbucher, K., ... & Wooldridge, M. (2024). Artificial intelligence and economic and financial policy making. A High-Level Panel of Experts’ Report to the G, 7.
[18] McGee, F. (2024). Approaching emergent risks: An exploratory study into artificial intelligence risk management within financial organisations. arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.05847. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2404.05847
[19] Chhillar, D., & Aguilera, R. V. (2022). An eye for artificial intelligence: Insights into the governance of artificial intelligence and vision for future research. Business & Society, 61(5), 1197-1241. https://doi.org/10.1177/00076503221080959
[20] Keller, A., Martins Pereira, C., & Pires, M. L. (2023). The European Union’s approach to artificial intelligence and the challenge of financial systemic risk. In Multidisciplinary perspectives on artificial intelligence and the law (pp. 415-439). Cham: Springer International Publishing.
How to cite this paper
@article{1718060,
author = {Rohit Rajdev},
title = {The Hidden Risk: AI Without Governance Is the Next Financial Crisis},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2026},
volume = {9},
number = {11},
pages = {3214-3225},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1718060.pdf},
abstract = {Artificial Intelligence (AI) has been revolutionizing the global financial system with its various applications, such as predictive analytics, automated trading, credit scoring, fraud detection, and algorithmic risk management. These innovations increase operational efficiency and market responsiveness, but they create a new category of vulnerability at systemic level that can lead to systemic financial instability, in the absence of adequate governance structures. This article explores the threat posed by AI systems, which, if not properly managed and controlled, could be a catalyst for the next financial crisis. The study examines the potential effects of opaque algorithms, over-automated systems, biased decision-making, data manipulation and co-ordinated AI systems within financial infrastructures on increasing volatility and diminishing accountability of institutions. Previous research shows that AI systems can amplify contagion effects, exacerbate speculative trading, and provide false trading signals without transparency, ethical regulation and regulation coordination (Danielsson & Uthemann, 2025; Singh et al., 2025). Moreover, as predictive AI models gain traction in the banking and investment industry, there are governance risks regarding explainability, cybersecurity, accountability, and centralizing technological power (Feldman & Stein, 2022; Fritz-Morgenthal et al., 2022).
The article also reviews the governance lessons learned from the 2008 financial crisis, and highlights the fact that many of these issues are repeating themselves in the AI-powered financial ecosystems (Kathy, 2025; Goldin & Vogel, 2010). Furthermore, the study assesses ongoing international policy and regulatory responses, as well as financial institutions' and regulators' AI governance frameworks. The results indicate that the following elements are essential for good AI governance: clear algorithms, rules for responsible use of AI, cooperation between nations' regulations, ongoing auditing processes, and structures that put humans in the driver's seat. If these protections are not in place, AI could become a new threat to the financial system, rather than just a financial innovation tool, potentially threatening global markets. The article summarizes and explains that governance needs to keep up with the technological innovation if AI is not to be a threat to financial stability.},
keywords = {Artificial Intelligence, AI Governance, Financial Crisis, Systemic Risk, Algorithmic Accountability, Financial Stability, Risk Management, Predictive Analytics, Regulatory Frameworks},
month = {May},
doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I11-1718060}
}