Strategic HRM and Social Capital in Temple Governance: Driving Sacred Sustainability and Community Well-Being

References

[1] Agarwal, B. (2010). Gender and green governance: The political economy of women's presence within and beyond community forestry. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199569687.001.0001

[2] Barney, J. (1991). Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. Journal of Management, 17(1), 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108

[3] Blau, P. M. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. Wiley.

[4] Chapple, W., Morrison Paul, C. J., & Harris, R. (2011). Environmental regulation and innovation: A panel data study. Ecological Economics, 70(12), 2295–2305. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.07.005

[5] Collins, C. J., & Smith, K. G. (2006). Knowledge exchange and combination: The role of human resource practices in the performance of high-technology firms. Academy of Management Journal, 49(3), 544–560. https://doi.org/10.5465/amj.2006.21794671

[6] Freeman, R. E. (1984). Strategic management: A stakeholder approach. Pitman.

[7] Guthman, J. (2011). Weighing in: Obesity, food justice, and the limits of capitalism. University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520949750

[8] Jackson, S. E., Schuler, R. S., & Jiang, K. (2014). An aspirational framework for strategic human resource management. Academy of Management Annals, 8(1), 1–56. https://doi.org/10.1080/19416520.2014.872335

[9] Keyes, C. L. M. (1998). Social well-being. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61(2), 121–140. https://doi.org/10.2307/2787065

[10] Leana, C. R., & Van Buren, H. J. (1999). Organizational social capital and employment practices. Academy of Management Review, 24(3), 538–555. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1999.2202136

[11] Nahapiet, J., & Ghoshal, S. (1998). Social capital, intellectual capital, and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23(2), 242–266. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.1998.533225

[12] Ostrom, E. (1990). Governing the commons: The evolution of institutions for collective action. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807763

[13] Pretty, J. (2003). Social capital and the collective management of resources. Science, 302(5652), 1912–1914. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1090847

[14] Putnam, R. D. (1995). Bowling alone: America’s declining social capital. Journal of Democracy, 6(1), 65–78. https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.1995.0002

[15] Ridder, H. G., & McCandless, A. (2010). Influences on the architecture of human resource management in nonprofit organizations. Nonprofit and Voluntary Sector Quarterly, 39(1), 124–141. https://doi.org/10.1177/0899764008328184

[16] Tomalin, E. (2013). Religions and development. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203070592

[17] Taylor, B. (2010). Dark green religion: Nature spirituality and the planetary future. University of California Press. https://doi.org/10.1525/9780520948609

[18] Wright, P. M., & McMahan, G. C. (2011). Exploring human capital: Putting 'human' back into strategic human resource management. Human Resource Management Journal, 21(2), 93–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2010.00165.x

[19] Collins, C. J., & Clark, K. D. (2003). Strategic human resource practices, top management team social networks, and firm performance. Academy of Management Journal, 46(6), 740–751. https://doi.org/10.5465/30040665

[20] Diener, E., Suh, E. M., Lucas, R. E., & Smith, H. L. (1999). Subjective well-being: Three decades of progress. Psychological Bulletin, 125(2), 276–302. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-2909.125.2.276

[21] Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069–1081. https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.57.6.1069

[22] Seligman, M. E. P. (2002). Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment. Free Press.

[23] Wright, P. M., Dunford, B. B., & Snell, S. A. (2001). Human resources and the resource-based view of the firm. Journal of Management, 27(6), 701–721. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920630102700607

[24] Paauwe, J., & Boselie, P. (2005). HRM and performance: What’s next? Human Resource Management Journal, 15(4), 68–83. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-8583.2005.tb00296.x

[25] Guest, D. E. (2017). Human resource management and employee well-being: Towards a new analytic framework. Human Resource Management Journal, 27(1), 22–38. https://doi.org/10.1111/1748-8583.12139

[26] Jabbour, C. J. C., & de Sousa Jabbour, A. B. L. (2016). Green human resource management and green supply chain management: Linking two emerging agendas. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112(3), 1824–1833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.01.052

[27] Renwick, D. W. S., Redman, T., & Maguire, S. (2013). Green human resource management: A review and research agenda. International Journal of Management Reviews, 15(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2370.2011.00328.x

[28] Luthans, F., Avey, J. B., Avolio, B. J., Norman, S. M., & Combs, G. M. (2006). Psychological capital development: Toward a micro-intervention. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(3), 387–393. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.373

[29] Avey, J. B., Reichard, R. J., Luthans, F., & Mhatre, K. H. (2011). Meta-analysis of the impact of positive psychological capital on employee attitudes, behaviors, and performance. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 22(2), 127–152. https://doi.org/10.1002/hrdq.20070

@article{1718087,
      author = {Dr. P. Vijayashree, Dr. C. Chitra},
      title = {Strategic HRM and Social Capital in Temple Governance: Driving Sacred Sustainability and Community Well-Being},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {9},
      number = {11},
      pages = {2109-2120},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1718087.pdf},
      abstract = {Purpose
This study investigates how Strategic Human Resource Management (SHRM) practices in temple governance shape social capital, foster sacred sustainability, and enhances community well-being in Kerala. While existing literature has examined religious institutions primarily through cultural or ritualistic lenses, limited empirical research has integrated SHRM perspectives with social capital and sustainability in the context of temple governance. This research addresses this gap by exploring the pathways through which SHRM contributes to community development outcome.
Design/Methodology/Approach:
The study adopts a quantitative survey design, collecting responses from 200 stakeholders including devotees, committee members, executive officers, trustees and Mathrusamithi members (women-led committees) across selected temples in Kerala. A structured questionnaire was developed drawing upon validated scales in SHRM, social capital, sustainability, and community well-being, adapted to the temple governance context. Data analysis was conducted using SPSS AMOS, applying correlation analysis, multiple regressions, ANOVA and Structural Equation Modelling (SEM) to test the hypothesised relationships. Reliability and validity of constructs were assessed through Cronbach’s alpha, composite reliability, and confirmatory factor analysis.
Findings:
Preliminary results indicate that SHRM practices such as participative leadership, volunteer management, training and capacity building, and performance recognition positively influence both bonding and bridging forms of social capital. Social capital, in turn, has a significant effect on the adoption of sacred sustainability practices including eco-rituals, waste management, energy conservation, and preservation of sacred groves. Sacred sustainability is found to directly enhance community well-being, measured in terms of social cohesion, perceived environmental benefits, and spiritual fulfilment. Moreover, social capital and sacred sustainability jointly mediate the relationship between SHRM and community well-being, highlighting the importance of relational and ecological pathways in governance. ANOVA results suggest significant differences across stakeholder groups, with Mathrusamithi members and committee representatives perceiving stronger SHRM impacts compared to general devotees.
Originality/Value:
This study is among the first to empirically integrate SHRM in to the domain of temple governance, extending management theories into faith-based institutional contexts. By conceptualising and testing the linkages between SHRM, social capital, sustainability and well-being, the research contributes to both Strategic HRM and sustainable governance literature. Practically, the findings provide actionable insights for temple authorities and Devaswom Boards to strengthen participatory HRM practices build community trust and embed ecological stewardship within temple administration. 
The paper concludes that temple governance, when guided by SHRM and reinforced by social capital, can serve as a powerful platform for advancing sacred sustainability and enhancing community well-being in Kerala.
},
      keywords = {Strategic HRM, Temple Governance, Social Capital, Sacred Sustainability, Community well-being, Kerala.},
      month = {May},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I11-1718087}
  }