Home / Current Issue / Paper 1709214
Developing a Model for Real-Time Decision Support Integration in FPSO-Based Deepwater Production Operations
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Real-Time Decision Model
Abstract
Floating Production, Storage, and Offloading (FPSO) units are critical assets in deepwater oil and gas production, offering flexible and efficient solutions for hydrocarbon extraction in remote and challenging environments. However, the operational complexity, dynamic conditions, and safety-critical nature of FPSO-based deepwater production present significant challenges to effective decision-making. Real-time decision support systems (DSS) have emerged as essential tools to enhance situational awareness, optimize processes, and mitigate risks by integrating data from multiple sources and providing timely, actionable insights. Despite advances in automation and data analytics, the integration of real-time DSS tailored specifically for FPSO operations remains underdeveloped. This proposes a novel conceptual model for real-time decision support integration within FPSO-based deepwater production operations. The model is designed to assimilate heterogeneous data streams?including process measurements, environmental conditions, asset health indicators, and operational parameters?into a unified framework. Leveraging advanced technologies such as Internet of Things (IoT) sensors, edge computing, and artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML), the model facilitates real-time data processing, predictive analytics, and visualization to support operators and engineers in making informed decisions rapidly. Key features of the model include multi-layered data integration, predictive maintenance forecasting, anomaly detection, and automated alert generation, all embedded within an intuitive human-machine interface. The architecture emphasizes scalability, interoperability with existing control systems, and adaptability to varying FPSO configurations. Validation approaches, including simulation and pilot implementation, are discussed to demonstrate the model?s potential to improve operational efficiency, safety, and reliability. By providing a structured and technology-enabled framework for decision support, this model addresses the unique challenges of deepwater FPSO operations and contributes to the digital transformation of offshore production. Future research directions include empirical validation, integration of autonomous control capabilities, and extension to other offshore asset types, ultimately enhancing resilience and sustainability in complex marine environments.
Keywords
Developing, Model, Real-time, Decision support, Integration, FPSO-based, Deepwater production, Operations
References
[1] Aalberts, P., Ibekwe, A., Hageman, R., Oguntola, G., Izuchukwu, J., Sorensen, K., Nadathur, V. and van Vliet, R., 2019, April. Advisory hull monitoring system for the Bonga FPSO. In Offshore Technology Conference (p. D022S057R003). OTC.
[2] ADEWOYIN, M.A., OGUNNOWO, E.O., FIEMOTONGHA, J.E., IGUNMA, T.O. and ADELEKE, A.K., 2020. A Conceptual Framework for Dynamic Mechanical Analysis in High-Performance Material Selection.
[3] ADEWOYIN, M.A., OGUNNOWO, E.O., FIEMOTONGHA, J.E., IGUNMA, T.O. and ADELEKE, A.K., 2020. Advances in Thermofluid Simulation for Heat Transfer Optimization in Compact Mechanical Devices.
[4] Akinsanya, O.O., Papadaki, M. and Sun, L., 2019. Current cybersecurity maturity models: How effective in healthcare cloud?. In CEUR Workshop Proceedings (Vol. 2348, p. 211).
[5] Akpan, U.U., Adekoya, K.O., Awe, E.T., Garba, N., Oguncoker, G.D. and Ojo, S.G., 2017. Mini-STRs screening of 12 relatives of Hausa origin in northern Nigeria. Nigerian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences, 25(1), pp.48-57.
[6] Akpan, U.U., Awe, T.E. and Idowu, D., 2019. Types and frequency of fingerprint minutiae in individuals of Igbo and Yoruba ethnic groups of Nigeria. Ruhuna Journal of Science, 10(1).
[7] Alexandre, B., Reynaud, E., Osiurak, F. and Navarro, J., 2018. Acceptance and acceptability criteria: a literature review. Cognition, Technology & Work, 20, pp.165-177.
[8] Aricò, P., Borghini, G., Di Flumeri, G., Bonelli, S., Golfetti, A., Graziani, I., Pozzi, S., Imbert, J.P., Granger, G., Benhacene, R. and Schaefer, D., 2017. Human factors and neurophysiological metrics in air traffic control: a critical review. IEEE reviews in biomedical engineering, 10, pp.250-263.
[9] Armstrong, C., Drobyshevksi, Y., Chin, C. and Penesis, I., 2019. Probabilistic analysis of extreme riser responses for a weather-vaning FPSO in tropical cyclones. Journal of Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, 141(2), p.021602.
[10] Awe, E.T. and Akpan, U.U., 2017. Cytological study of Allium cepa and Allium sativum.
[11] Awe, E.T., 2017. Hybridization of snout mouth deformed and normal mouth African catfish Clarias gariepinus. Animal Research International, 14(3), pp.2804-2808.
[12] Awe, E.T., Akpan, U.U. and Adekoya, K.O., 2017. Evaluation of two MiniSTR loci mutation events in five Father-Mother-Child trios of Yoruba origin. Nigerian Journal of Biotechnology, 33, pp.120-124.
[13] Bano, M., Zowghi, D. and da Rimini, F., 2017. User satisfaction and system success: an empirical exploration of user involvement in software development. Empirical Software Engineering, 22(5), pp.2339-2372.
[14] Basole, R.C., Srinivasan, A., Park, H. and Patel, S., 2018. ecoxight: Discovery, exploration, and analysis of business ecosystems using interactive visualization. ACM Transactions on Management Information Systems (TMIS), 9(2), pp.1-26.
[15] Bhattarai, B.P., Paudyal, S., Luo, Y., Mohanpurkar, M., Cheung, K., Tonkoski, R., Hovsapian, R., Myers, K.S., Zhang, R., Zhao, P. and Manic, M., 2019. Big data analytics in smart grids: state‐of‐the‐art, challenges, opportunities, and future directions. IET Smart Grid, 2(2), pp.141-154.
[16] Bole, M., Powell, G. and Rousseau, E., 2017, October. Taking control of the digital twin. In SNAME Maritime Convention (p. D023S004R002). SNAME.
[17] Catota, F.E., Morgan, M.G. and Sicker, D.C., 2019. Cybersecurity education in a developing nation: The Ecuadorian environment. Journal of Cybersecurity, 5(1), p.tyz001.
[18] Choucri, N., Madnick, S.E. and Koepke, P., 2017. Institutions for cyber security: International responses and data sharing initiatives.
[19] Chudi, O., Iwegbu, J., Tetegan, G., Ikwueze, O., Effiom, O., Oke-Oghene, U., Ayodeji, B., Opatewa, S., Oladipo, T., Afolayan, T. and Tonyi, A.A., 2019, August. Integration of rock physics and seismic inversion for net-to-gross estimation: Implication for reservoir modelling and field development in offshore Niger Delta. In SPE Nigeria Annual International Conference and Exhibition (p. D033S028R010). SPE.
[20] Chudi, O., Kanu, M., Anaevune, A., Yamusa, I., Iwegbu, J., Sesan, O. and Musa, J., 2019, August. A Novel Approach for Predicting Sand Stringers: A Case Study of the Baka Field Offshore Nigeria. In SPE Nigeria Annual International Conference and Exhibition (p. D023S006R003). SPE.
[21] D'Souza, R., Basu, S., Bhaumik, T. and Sharples, M., 2019, October. The semisubmersible floating production system: a 25-year technical and historic retrospective. In SNAME Maritime Convention (p. D023S000R001). SNAME.
[22] Francis, R., 2019. Stainless steels. In Corrosion Performance of Metals for the Marine Environment EFC 63 (pp. 14-25). CRC Press.
[23] Franklin, A., Gantela, S., Shifarraw, S., Johnson, T.R., Robinson, D.J., King, B.R., Mehta, A.M., Maddow, C.L., Hoot, N.R., Nguyen, V. and Rubio, A., 2017. Dashboard visualizations: Supporting real-time throughput decision-making. Journal of biomedical informatics, 71, pp.211-221.
[24] Gayes, P.T., Knapp, C.C., Knapp, J., Brantley, D., White, S., Battista, B., Spirek, J.D., Brown, D.M., Christian, L.M., Bradley, R.J. and Harris, M.S., 2019. Atlantic Offshore Wind Energy Development: Geophysical Mapping And Identification Of Paleolandscapes And Historic Shipwrecks Offshore South Carolina.
[25] Givehchi, O., Landsdorf, K., Simoens, P. and Colombo, A.W., 2017. Interoperability for industrial cyber-physical systems: An approach for legacy systems. IEEE Transactions on Industrial Informatics, 13(6), pp.3370-3378.
[26] Gubbi, S., Hamet, P., Tremblay, J., Koch, C.A. and Hannah-Shmouni, F., 2019. Artificial intelligence and machine learning in endocrinology and metabolism: the dawn of a new era. Frontiers in endocrinology, 10, p.185.
[27] Gulas, S., Downton, M., D'Souza, K., Hayden, K. and Walker, T.R., 2017. Declining Arctic Ocean oil and gas developments: Opportunities to improve governance and environmental pollution control. Marine Policy, 75, pp.53-61.
[28] Hansen, L.S., Pedersen, S. and Durdevic, P., 2019. Multi-phase flow metering in offshore oil and gas transportation pipelines: Trends and perspectives. Sensors, 19(9), p.2184.
[29] Kalliski, M., Beisheim, B., Ackerschott, D., Krämer, S. and Engell, S., 2018. REI‐Based Decision Support. Resource Efficiency of Processing Plants: Monitoring and Improvement, pp.211-237.
[30] Kim, T.J. and Seong, P.H., 2019. Influencing factors on situation assessment of human operators in unexpected plant conditions. Annals of Nuclear Energy, 132, pp.526-536.
[31] LaGrange, E. and Maisey, J., 2019, April. New concepts for a normally unattended installation NUI–Design, operation, automation, and digitalization. In Offshore Technology Conference (p. D031S032R002). OTC.
[32] Lee, J., Noh, S.D., Kim, H.J. and Kang, Y.S., 2018. Implementation of cyber-physical production systems for quality prediction and operation control in metal casting. Sensors, 18(5), p.1428.
[33] Lilis, G., Conus, G., Asadi, N. and Kayal, M., 2017. Towards the next generation of intelligent building: An assessment study of current automation and future IoT based systems with a proposal for transitional design. Sustainable cities and society, 28, pp.473-481.
[34] Lu, H., Guo, L. and Zhang, Y., 2019. Oil and gas companies' low-carbon emission transition to integrated energy companies. Science of the Total Environment, 686, pp.1202-1209.
[35] Magnus, K., Edwin, Q., Samuel, O. and Nedomien, O., 2011, September. Onshore 4D processing: Niger Delta example: Kolo Creek case study. In SEG International Exposition and Annual Meeting (pp. SEG-2011). SEG.
[36] Mastrangelo, C.F., Lan, C.M. and Smith, C.E., 2019, April. From tanker-ships to the first FPSO in the US GoM. In Offshore Technology Conference (p. D022S057R001). OTC.
[37] Max, M.D., Johnson, A.H., Max, M.D. and Johnson, A.H., 2019. Leveraging Technology for NGH Development and Production. Exploration and Production of Oceanic Natural Gas Hydrate: Critical Factors for Commercialization, pp.227-279.
[38] Meera, N., 2019. Securing the Expanding Attack Surface: Challenges and Strategies for Enterprise Cybersecurity in the Post-Snowden Era. International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development, 3(4), pp.1954-1964.
[39] Mehmood, M.U., Chun, D., Han, H., Jeon, G. and Chen, K., 2019. A review of the applications of artificial intelligence and big data to buildings for energy-efficiency and a comfortable indoor living environment. Energy and buildings, 202, p.109383.
[40] Meng, H., Kloul, L. and Rauzy, A., 2018. Production availability analysis of Floating Production Storage and Offloading (FPSO) systems. Applied Ocean Research, 74, pp.117-126.
[41] Metcalf, L., Askay, D.A. and Rosenberg, L.B., 2019. Keeping humans in the loop: pooling knowledge through artificial swarm intelligence to improve business decision making. California management review, 61(4), pp.84-109.
[42] Mishra, M., Sidoti, D., Avvari, G.V., Mannaru, P., Ayala, D.F.M., Pattipati, K.R. and Kleinman, D.L., 2017. A context-driven framework for proactive decision support with applications. IEEE Access, 5, pp.12475-12495.
[43] Monteverde, C., Novello, M. and Kristiansen, K., 2019, April. A new all electric subsea control system development. In Offshore Technology Conference (p. D031S041R001). OTC.
[44] Morgan, J. and O’Donnell, G.E., 2017. Enabling a ubiquitous and cloud manufacturing foundation with field-level service-oriented architecture. International Journal of Computer Integrated Manufacturing, 30(4-5), pp.442-458.
[45] Mughal, A.A., 2019. Cybersecurity hygiene in the era of internet of things (IoT): Best practices and challenges. Applied Research in Artificial Intelligence and Cloud Computing, 2(1), pp.1-31.
[46] Munafờ, A., Pebody, M., Consensi, A., Fanelli, F., Fenucci, D., Fox, P., Marlow, R. and Prampart, T., 2019, June. The NOCS on-board control system. In OCEANS 2019-marseille (pp. 1-8). IEEE.
[47] Nicoletti, B. and Nicoletti, B., 2018. Fintech and procurement finance 4.0. Procurement Finance: The Digital Revolution in Commercial Banking, pp.155-248.
[48] Nuzzolo, A. and Lam, W.H., 2017. Real-time Operations Management Decision Support Systems: A Conceptual Framework. In Modelling Intelligent Multi-Modal Transit Systems (pp. 124-145). CRC Press.
[49] OGUNNOWO, E.O., ADEWOYIN, M.A., FIEMOTONGHA, J.E., IGUNMA, T.O. and ADELEKE, A.K., 2020. Systematic Review of Non-Destructive Testing Methods for Predictive Failure Analysis in Mechanical Systems.
[50] Omisola, J.O., Etukudoh, E.A., Okenwa, O.K. and Tokunbo, G.I., 2020. Innovating Project Delivery and Piping Design for Sustainability in the Oil and Gas Industry: A Conceptual Framework. perception, 24, pp.28-35.
[51] Ortiz, G., Caravaca, J.A., García-de-Prado, A. and Boubeta-Puig, J., 2019. Real-time context-aware microservice architecture for predictive analytics and smart decision-making. IEEE Access, 7, pp.183177-183194.
[52] Osman, A.M.S., 2019. A novel big data analytics framework for smart cities. Future Generation Computer Systems, 91, pp.620-633.
[53] Oyedokun, O.O., 2019. Green human resource management practices and its effect on the sustainable competitive edge in the Nigerian manufacturing industry (Dangote) (Doctoral dissertation, Dublin Business School).
[54] Pernet, C., Garrido, M., Gramfort, A., Maurits, N., Michel, C., Pang, E., Salmelin, R., Schoffelen, J.M., Valdes-Sosa, P.A. and Puce, A., 2018. Best practices in data analysis and sharing in neuroimaging using MEEG.
[55] Puecher, L., Clare, P. and Rastogi, A., 2017, May. Stampede Multi-Purpose Dynamic Simulator. In Offshore Technology Conference (p. D032S059R001). OTC.
[56] Qi, Q. and Tao, F., 2019. A smart manufacturing service system based on edge computing, fog computing, and cloud computing. IEEE access, 7, pp.86769-86777.
[57] Raybourn, E.M., Schatz, S., Volgol-Walcutt, J. and Vierling, K., 2017. At the Tipping Point: Learning Science and Technology as Key Strategic Enablers for the Future of Defense and Security (No. SAND2017-7085C). Sandia National Lab.(SNL-NM), Albuquerque, NM (United States).
[58] Ribotti, A., Antognarelli, F., Cucco, A., Falcieri, M.F., Fazioli, L., Ferrarin, C., Olita, A., Oliva, G., Pes, A., Quattrocchi, G. and Satta, A., 2018. An operational marine oil spill forecasting tool for the management of emergencies in the Italian seas. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 7(1), p.1.
[59] Sarikaya, A., Correll, M., Bartram, L., Tory, M. and Fisher, D., 2018. What do we talk about when we talk about dashboards?. IEEE transactions on visualization and computer graphics, 25(1), pp.682-692.
[60] Sivils, P., Rieger, C., Amarasinghe, K. and Manic, M., 2019. Integrated Cyber Physical Assessment and Response for Improved Resiliency. The Internet of Things for Smart Urban Ecosystems, pp.51-74.
[61] Solanke*, B., Aigbokhai, U., Kanu, M. and Madiba, G., 2014. Impact of accounting for velocity anisotropy on depth image; Niger Delta case history. In SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts 2014 (pp. 400-404). Society of Exploration Geophysicists.
[62] Sotoodeh, K., 2019. A review on subsea process and valve technology. Marine Systems & Ocean Technology, 14(4), pp.210-219.
[63] Taleb, T., Samdanis, K., Mada, B., Flinck, H., Dutta, S. and Sabella, D., 2017. On multi-access edge computing: A survey of the emerging 5G network edge cloud architecture and orchestration. IEEE Communications Surveys & Tutorials, 19(3), pp.1657-1681.
[64] Terziyan, V., Gryshko, S. and Golovianko, M., 2018. Patented intelligence: Cloning human decision models for Industry 4.0. Journal of manufacturing systems, 48, pp.204-217.
[65] Thomas, R., Idol, T. and Open Geospatial Consortium, 2019. Development of Spatial Data Infrastructures for Marine Data Management; OGC-IHO Marine SDI Concept Development Study (CDS).
[66] Tolio, T., Copani, G. and Terkaj, W., 2019. Key research priorities for factories of the future—part I: missions. Factories of the Future: The Italian Flagship Initiative, pp.433-474.
[67] Trakadas, P., Nomikos, N., Michailidis, E.T., Zahariadis, T., Facca, F.M., Breitgand, D., Rizou, S., Masip, X. and Gkonis, P., 2019. Hybrid clouds for data-intensive, 5G-enabled IoT applications: An overview, key issues and relevant architecture. Sensors, 19(16), p.3591.
[68] Utne, I.B., Schjølberg, I. and Roe, E., 2019. High reliability management and control operator risks in autonomous marine systems and operations. Ocean Engineering, 171, pp.399-416.
[69] Verma, S., Mohanty, S. and Nayak, S.K., 2019. A review on protective polymeric coatings for marine applications. Journal of coatings technology and research, 16, pp.307-338.
[70] Whyte, A., Nishanth, R. and Kurian, V., 2018. Floating production storage and offloading systems’ cost and motion performance: A systems thinking application. Frontiers of Engineering Management, 5(3), pp.357-368.
[71] Wong, C., Yang, E., Yan, X.T. and Gu, D., 2018. Autonomous robots for harsh environments: a holistic overview of current solutions and ongoing challenges. Systems Science & Control Engineering, 6(1), pp.213-219.
[72] Wu, E., Psallidas, F., Miao, Z., Zhang, H., Rettig, L., Wu, Y. and Sellam, T., 2017, January. Combining Design and Performance in a Data Visualization Management System. In CIDR.
[73] Xu, X., Sahoo, P., Evans, J. and Tao, Y., 2019. Hydrodynamic performances of FPSO and shuttle tanker during side-by-side offloading operation. Ships and Offshore Structures, 14(sup1), pp.292-299.
[74] Yin, S., Kim, M., Kadetotad, D., Liu, Y., Bae, C., Kim, S.J., Cao, Y. and Seo, J.S., 2019. A 1.06-$\mu $ W Smart ECG Processor in 65-nm CMOS for Real-Time Biometric Authentication and Personal Cardiac Monitoring. IEEE Journal of Solid-State Circuits, 54(8), pp.2316-2326.
[75] Zanganeh, R. and Thiagarajan, K., 2018. Prediction of the mean heading of a turret moored FPSO in bi-modal and bi-directional sea states. Applied Ocean Research, 78, pp.156-166.
How to cite this paper
@article{1709214,
author = {Andrew Tochukwu Ofoedu, Joshua Emeka Ozor, Oludayo Sofoluwe, Dazok Donald Jambol},
title = {Developing a Model for Real-Time Decision Support Integration in FPSO-Based Deepwater Production Operations},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2020},
volume = {4},
number = {2},
pages = {196-211},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1709214.pdf},
abstract = {Floating Production, Storage, and Offloading (FPSO) units are critical assets in deepwater oil and gas production, offering flexible and efficient solutions for hydrocarbon extraction in remote and challenging environments. However, the operational complexity, dynamic conditions, and safety-critical nature of FPSO-based deepwater production present significant challenges to effective decision-making. Real-time decision support systems (DSS) have emerged as essential tools to enhance situational awareness, optimize processes, and mitigate risks by integrating data from multiple sources and providing timely, actionable insights. Despite advances in automation and data analytics, the integration of real-time DSS tailored specifically for FPSO operations remains underdeveloped. This proposes a novel conceptual model for real-time decision support integration within FPSO-based deepwater production operations. The model is designed to assimilate heterogeneous data streams?including process measurements, environmental conditions, asset health indicators, and operational parameters?into a unified framework. Leveraging advanced technologies such as Internet of Things (IoT) sensors, edge computing, and artificial intelligence/machine learning (AI/ML), the model facilitates real-time data processing, predictive analytics, and visualization to support operators and engineers in making informed decisions rapidly. Key features of the model include multi-layered data integration, predictive maintenance forecasting, anomaly detection, and automated alert generation, all embedded within an intuitive human-machine interface. The architecture emphasizes scalability, interoperability with existing control systems, and adaptability to varying FPSO configurations. Validation approaches, including simulation and pilot implementation, are discussed to demonstrate the model?s potential to improve operational efficiency, safety, and reliability. By providing a structured and technology-enabled framework for decision support, this model addresses the unique challenges of deepwater FPSO operations and contributes to the digital transformation of offshore production. Future research directions include empirical validation, integration of autonomous control capabilities, and extension to other offshore asset types, ultimately enhancing resilience and sustainability in complex marine environments.},
keywords = {Developing, Model, Real-time, Decision support, Integration, FPSO-based, Deepwater production, Operations},
month = {August},
}