Home / Current Issue / Paper 1709491
Federated Learning for Privacy-Preserving Fraud Detection in Digital Banking: Balancing Algorithmic Performance, Privacy, and Regulatory Compliance
Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology · Area of research: Privacy-Enhanced Machine Learning
Abstract
The rapid growth of digital banking has heightened concerns over cybersecurity, privacy, and regulatory compliance, particularly in the detection and prevention of financial fraud. Traditional centralized machine learning approaches to fraud detection are limited by data privacy regulations and the increasing complexity of cyber threats. Federated Learning (FL), a decentralized machine learning technique, offers a promising alternative by enabling multiple institutions to collaboratively train models without sharing raw data. This study critically evaluates the application of FL in privacy-preserving fraud detection within the banking sector, focusing on algorithmic performance, privacy implications, and regulatory compliance. The paper reviews existing literature, assesses technical challenges such as data heterogeneity and communication overhead, and presents case studies of FL implementation in real-world banking contexts. The findings reveal that FL significantly enhances privacy and regulatory alignment while maintaining competitive fraud detection performance. The study concludes by offering strategic recommendations for digital banks and regulatory bodies and identifies future research directions that emphasize adaptive learning algorithms, robust evaluation frameworks, and long-term federated infrastructure in financial systems.
Keywords
Federated Learning; Fraud Detection; Digital Banking; Privacy; Regulatory Compliance; Machine Learning
References
[1] Munira, M., & Khatun, M. S. (2025). Digital transformation in banking: A systematic review of trends, technologies, and challenges. Available from SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=5161354 or http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5161354
[2] Windasari, N. A., Kusumawati, N., Larasati, N., & Amelia, R. P. (2022). Digital-only banking experience: Insights from gen Y and gen Z. Journal of Innovation & Knowledge, 7(2), 100170. 1 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jik.2022.100170
[3] Ionașcu, A. E., Gheorghiu, G., Spătariu, E. C., Munteanu, I., Grigorescu, A., & Dănilă, A. (2023). Unraveling Digital Transformation in Banking: Evidence from Romania. Systems, 11(11), 534. https://doi.org/10.3390/systems11110534.
[4] R, Y., Nithin, C., G, T., & Safi, Dr. K. (2025). The rise of digital banking and its effect on traditional banks. EPRA International Journal of Environmental Economics, Commerce and Educational Management, 12(4), 30. https://doi.org/10.36713/epra0414
[5] Wang, S., Asif, M., Shahzad, M. F., & Ashfaq, M. (2024). Data Privacy and Cybersecurity Challenges in the Digital Transformation of the Banking Sector. Computers & Security, 143, 104051. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2024.104051
[6] Ferrão, S. É. R., Silva, G. R. S., Canedo, E. D., & Mendes, F. F. (2024, April). Towards a taxonomy of privacy requirements based on the LGPD and ISO/IEC 29100. Information and Software Technology, 168, 107396. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.infsof.2024.107396
[7] Wong, R., Chong, A., & Aspegren, C. (2023, April). Privacy Legislation as Business Risks: How GDPR and CCPA are Represented in Technology Companies' Investment Risk Disclosures. Proceedings of the ACM on Human-Computer Interaction, 7(CSCW1), 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1145/3579515
[8] Rafi, T. H., Noor, F. A., Hussain, T., & Chae, D.-K. (2024, May). Fairness and privacy preserving in federated learning: A survey. Information Fusion, 105, 102198.
[9] Orabi, M. M., Emam, O., & Fahmy, H. (2025). Adapting security and decentralized knowledge enhancement in federated learning using blockchain technology: literature review. Journal of Big Data, 12, 55. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40537-025-01099-5
[10] Aljunaid, S. K., Almheiri, S. J., Dawood, H., & Khan, M. A. (2025). Secure and Transparent Banking: Explainable AI-Driven Federated Learning Model for Financial Fraud Detection. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(4), 179. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18040179.
[11] Susmitha, N., & Kalpana, Smt. A. (2025, January). Fraud Detection in Banking Data Using Machine Learning Techniques. Journal of Engineering Sciences, 16(04), 120-125.
[12] Sunhare, M., & Mandloi, R. S. (2025, February). Developing Machine Learning Models for Real-Time Fraud Detection in Online Transactions. International Journal of Advanced Research in Electrical, Electronics and Instrumentation Engineering (IJAREEIE), 14(2), 465. https://doi.org/10.15662/IJAREEIE.2025.1402019.
[13] Hilal, W., Gadsden, S. A., & Yawney, J. (2022, May 1). Financial Fraud: A Review of Anomaly Detection Techniques and Recent Advances. Expert Systems with Applications, 193, 116429. 1 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2021.116429
[14] Gresoi, S., Stamatescu, G., & Făgărășan, I. (2025). Advanced Methodology for Fraud Detection in Energy Using Machine Learning Algorithms. Applied Sciences, 15(6), 3361. https://doi.org/10.3390/app15063361
[15] Bello, O. A., Folorunso, A., Onwuchekwa, J., Ejiofor, O. E., Budale, F. Z., & Egwuonwu, M. N. (2023). Analysing the Impact of Advanced Analytics on Fraud Detection: A Machine Learning Perspective. European Journal of Computer Science and Information Technology, 11(6), 103-126. 1 https://doi.org/10.37745/ejcsit.2013/vol11n6103126
[16] Kuyoro, S. O., Ogunyolu, O., Ayanwola, T., & Ayankoya, F. Y. (2022, October). Dynamic Effectiveness of Random Forest Algorithm in Financial Credit Risk Management for Improving Output Accuracy and Loan Classification Prediction. Ingénierie des systèmes d information, 27(5), 815-821. https://doi.org/10.18280/isi.270515
[17] Afriyie, J. K., Tawiah, K., Pels, W. A., Addai-Henne, S., Dwamena, H. A., Owiredu, E. O., ... & Eshun, J. (2023). A supervised machine learning algorithm for detecting and predicting fraud in credit card transactions. Decision Analytics Journal, 6, 100163. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dajour.2023.100163.
[18] Preciado Martínez, P. M., Reier Forradellas, R. F., Garay Gallastegui, L. M., & Náñez Alonso, S. L. (2025). Comparative analysis of machine learning models for the detection of fraudulent banking transactions. Cogent Business & Management, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311975.2025.2474209
[19] Barry, M., Bifet, A., Chiky, R., Montiel, J., & Tran, V.-T. (2021). Challenges of machine learning for data streams in the banking industry. In Big Data Analytics (pp. xx-xx). Springer, Cham. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-93620-4_9
[20] Agripina, N.E.M.R., Shen, H. and Mafukidze, B.S. (2024) Advances, Challenges & Recent Developments in Federated Learning. Open Access Library Journal, 11, 1-1. doi: 10.4236/oalib.1112239.
[21] Edegbe, G. N., & Acheme, S. (2024). A systematic review of centralized and decentralized machine learning models: Security concerns, defenses and future directions. NIPES Journal of Science and Technology Research, 6(4), 161-175. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14681449
[22] Drainakis, G., Katsaros, K. V., Pantazopoulos, P., Sourlas, V., & Amditis, A. (2020). Federated vs. centralized machine learning under privacy-elastic users: A comparative analysis. In Proceedings of the 19th IEEE International Symposium on Network Computing and Applications (NCA 2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/NCA51143.2020.9306745
[23] Mohammadi, S., Balador, A., Sinaei, S., & Flammini, F. (2024). Balancing privacy and performance in federated learning: A systematic literature review on methods and metrics. Journal of Parallel and Distributed Computing, 192, 104918. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jpdc.2024.104918.
[24] Yurdem, B., Kuzlu, M., Gullu, M. K., Catak, F. O., & Tabassum, M. (2024). Federated learning: Overview, strategies, applications, tools and future directions. Heliyon, 10(19), e38137. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38137.
[25] Myakala, P. K., Bura, C., & Jonnalagadda, A. K. (2024). Federated learning and data privacy: A review of challenges and opportunities. International Journal of Research Publication and Reviews, 5(12), 1867-1879. https://doi.org/10.55248/gengpi.5.1224.3512
[26] Agripina, N.E.M.R., Shen, H. and Mafukidze, B.S. (2024) Advances, Challenges & Recent Developments in Federated Learning. Open Access Library Journal, 11, 1-1. doi: 10.4236/oalib.1112239.
[27] Barona López, L. I., & Borja Saltos, T. (2025). Heterogeneity Challenges of Federated Learning for Future Wireless Communication Networks. Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks, 14(2), 37. https://doi.org/10.3390/jsan14020037.
[28] Bhanbhro, J., Nisticò, S. & Palopoli, L. Issues in federated learning: some experiments and preliminary results. Sci Rep 14, 29881 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-81732-0
[29] Xu, C., Qu, Y., Xiang, Y., & Gao, L. (2023). Asynchronous federated learning on heterogeneous devices: A survey. Computer Science Review, 50, 100595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosrev.2023.100595
[30] Zhu, B., & Niu, L. (2025). A privacy-preserving federated learning scheme with homomorphic encryption and edge computing. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 118, 11-20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.aej.2024.12.070.
[31] Wulan, R. B. (2023). Legal protection of customer personal data in the banking sector. ARRUS Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 3(5), 710–717. https://doi.org/10.35877/soshum2169
[32] Yang, Q., Liu, Y., Chen, T., & Tong, Y. (2020). Federated machine learning: Concept and applications. ACM Transactions on Intelligent Systems and Technology, 10(2), 1–19.
[33] N. F. Aurna, M. D. Hossain, Y. Taenaka and Y. Kadobayashi, "Federated Learning-Based Credit Card Fraud Detection: Performance Analysis with Sampling Methods and Deep Learning Algorithms," 2023 IEEE International Conference on Cyber Security and Resilience (CSR), Venice, Italy, 2023, pp. 180-186, doi: 10.1109/CSR57506.2023.10224978.
[34] Salam, M. A., Fouad, K. M., Elbably, D. L., & Elsayed, S. M. (2024). Federated learning model for credit card fraud detection with data balancing techniques. Neural Computing and Applications, 36, 6231–6256. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00521-023-09410-2.
[35] Sun, R. (2025). A comprehensive investigation of fraud detection behavior in federated learning. ITM Web of Conferences, 70, 03030. https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20257003030.
[36] Aljunaid, S. K., Almheiri, S. J., Dawood, H., & Khan, M. A. (2025). Secure and Transparent Banking: Explainable AI-Driven Federated Learning Model for Financial Fraud Detection. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 18(4), 179. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm18040179.
[37] Dritsas, E., & Trigka, M. (2025). Federated Learning for IoT: A Survey of Techniques, Challenges, and Applications. Journal of Sensor and Actuator Networks, 14(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.3390/jsan14010009.
[38] Zheng, H. (2025). Federated Learning-Based Credit Card Fraud Detection: A Comparative Analysis of Advanced Machine Learning Models. ITM Web of Conferences, 70, 01022. https://doi.org/10.1051/itmconf/20257001022.
[39] Tang, Y., & Liang, Y. (2024). Credit card fraud detection based on federated graph learning. Expert Systems with Applications, 256, 124979. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2024.124979.
[40] Google Cloud. (2025). To help combat fraud, Google Cloud and Swift pioneer advanced AI and federated learning tech. Retrieved from https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/identity-security/google-cloud-and-swift-pioneer-advanced-ai-and-federated-learning-tech.
[41] Guo, W., Zhuang, F., Zhang, X., Tong, Y., & Dong, J. (2024). A comprehensive survey of federated transfer learning: challenges, methods and applications. Frontiers of Computer Science, 18, 186356. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11704-024-40065-x.
[42] Barreto, B., Senna, C., Rito, P., & Sargento, S. (2025). MobFedLS: A framework to provide federated learning for mobile nodes in V2X environments. Future Generation Computer Systems, 163, 107514. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.future.2024.107514.
[43] Kaur, R., Gabrijelčič, D., & Klobučar, T. (2023). Artificial intelligence for cybersecurity: Literature review and future research directions. Information Fusion, 97, 101804. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.inffus.2023.101804.
[44] Zarsky, T. (2017). Incompatible: The GDPR in the Age of Big Data. Seton Hall Law Review, 47(4), 1041-1072. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3022646.
[45] Khan, S., Kabanov, I., Madnick, S., & Hua, Y. (2023). A Systematic Analysis of the Capital One Data Breach: Critical Lessons Learned. ACM Transactions on Privacy and Security. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3546068.
[46] Abadi, M., Chu, A., Goodfellow, I., McMahan, H. B., Mironov, I., Talwar, K., & Zhang, L. (2016). Deep learning with differential privacy. In Proceedings of the 2016 ACM SIGSAC Conference on Computer and Communications Security (pp. 308-318). https://doi.org/10.1145/2976749.2978318.
[47] Rahaman, M., Arya, V., Orozco, S. M., & Pappachan, P. (2024). Secure Multi-Party Computation (SMPC) Protocols and Privacy. In Innovations in Modern Cryptography, IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3693-5330-1.ch008.
[48] Kanamori, S., Abe, T., Ito, T., Emura, K., Wang, L., Yamamoto, S., ... & Nojima, R. (2022). Privacy-Preserving Federated Learning for Detecting Fraudulent Financial Transactions in Japanese Banks. Journal of Information Processing, 30, 789-795. https://doi.org/10.2197/ipsjjip.30.789
[49] Truong, N., Sun, K., Wang, S., Guitton, F., & Guo, Y. (2021). Privacy preservation in federated learning: An insightful survey from the GDPR perspective. Computers & Security, 110, 102402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2021.102402.
[50] El Mestari, S. Z., Lenzini, G., & Demirci, H. (2024). Preserving data privacy in machine learning systems. Computers & Security, 137, 103605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cose.2023.103605
[51] Feretzakis, G., Vagena, E., Kalodanis, K., Peristera, P., Kalles, D., & Anastasiou, A. (2025). GDPR and Large Language Models: Technical and Legal Obstacles. Future Internet, 17(4), 151. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi17040151.
[52] Papadopoulos, C., Kollias, K.-F., & Fragulis, G. F. (2024). Recent Advancements in Federated Learning: State of the Art, Fundamentals, Principles, IoT Applications and Future Trends. Future Internet, 16(11), 415. https://doi.org/10.3390/fi16110415.
[53] Shukla, S., Rajkumar, S., Sinha, A., Esha, M., Elango, K., & Sampath, V. (2025). Federated learning with differential privacy for breast cancer diagnosis enabling secure data sharing and model integrity. Scientific Reports, 15, 13061. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-95858-2.
[54] Hard, A., Rao, K., Mathews, R., Ramaswamy, S., Beaufays, F., Augenstein, S., Eichner, H., Kiddon, C., & Ramage, D. (2018). Federated learning for mobile keyboard prediction. arXiv:1811.03604 [cs.CL]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1811.03604.
[55] Zhu, H., Xu, J., Liu, S., & Jin, Y. (2021). Federated Learning on Non-IID Data: A Survey. arXiv:2106.06843 [cs.LG]. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2106.06843
[56] Z. Lu, H. Pan, Y. Dai, X. Si and Y. Zhang, "Federated Learning With Non-IID Data: A Survey," in IEEE Internet of Things Journal, vol. 11, no. 11, pp. 19188-19209, 1 June1, 2024, doi: 10.1109/JIOT.2024.3376548.
[57] Kairouz, P., McMahan, H. B., Avent, B., Bellet, A., Bennis, M., Bhagoji, A. N., ... & Ramage, D. (n.d.). Advances and Open Problems in Federated Learning. Now Foundations and Trends. https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/Xplore/home.jsp
[58] Google Cloud. (2025). To help combat fraud, Google Cloud and Swift pioneer advanced AI and federated learning tech. Retrieved from https://cloud.google.com/blog/products/identity-security/google-cloud-and-swift-pioneer-advanced-ai-and-federated-learning-tech
[59] Xu, Z., Zhang, Y., Andrew, G., Choquette, C., Kairouz, P., McMahan, B., Rosenstock, J., & Zhang, Y. (2023). Federated Learning of Gboard Language Models with Differential Privacy. In Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 5: Industry Track), pages 629–639, Toronto, Canada. Association for Computational Linguistics. DOI: 10.18653/v1/2023.acl-industry.60.
[60] Khan, A., ten Thij, M. & Wilbik, A. (2025). Vertical federated learning: a structured literature review. Knowl Inf Syst 67, 3205–3243 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10115-025-02356-y
[61] Lee, C. M., Fernandez, J. D., Menci, S. P., ... & Fridgen, G. (2023). Federated Learning for Credit Risk Assessment. In Proceedings of the 56th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, Maui, HI. https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2023.048.
[62] Boyapati, M., & Aygun, R. (2024). BalancerGNN: Balancer Graph Neural Networks for imbalanced datasets: A case study on fraud detection. Neural Networks, 182(1), 106926. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neunet.2024.106926.
[63] Chung, W.-C., Lin, Y.-H., & Fang, S.-H. (2023). FedISM: Enhancing Data Imbalance via Shared Model in Federated Learning. Mathematics, 11(10), 2385. https://doi.org/10.3390/math11102385.
[64] Hua, S., Zhang, C., Yang, G., Fu, J., Yang, Z., Wang, L., & Ren, J. (2024). An FTwNB Shield: A Credit Risk Assessment Model for Data Uncertainty and Privacy Protection. Mathematics, 12(11), 1695. https://doi.org/10.3390/math12111695
[65] Olowu, O., Adeleye, A. O., Omokanye, A. O., Ajayi, A. M., Adepoju, A. O., Omole, O. M., &Chianumba, E. C. (2024). AI-driven fraud detection in banking: A systematic review of data science approaches to enhancing cybersecurity.
[66] Ariyibi, K. O., Bello, O. F., Ekundayo, T. F., &Ishola, O. (2024).Leveraging Artificial Intelligence for enhanced tax fraud detection in modern fiscal systems.
[67] Adesola O., Taiwo I., David, D. A., Ezenwa, H. N., & Quddus, A. A. (2025). Utilizing AI and machine learning algorithms to optimize supplier relationship management and risk mitigation in global supply chains.International Journal of Science and Research Archive, 2025, 14(02), 219-228
[68] David, A. A., & Edoise, A. (2025). Cloud computing and Machine Learning for Scalable Predictive Analytics and Automation: A Framework for Solving Real-world Problem.
[69] Olawale, A., Ajoke, O., &Adeusi, C. (2020).Quality assessment and monitoring of networks using passive
How to cite this paper
@article{1709491,
author = {Michael Friday Umakor, Ikechukwu Iheanyi, Ugochukwu Daniel Ofurum, Ugochukwu Henry Ben Ibecheozor, Elizabeth Ayodeji Adeyefa},
title = {Federated Learning for Privacy-Preserving Fraud Detection in Digital Banking: Balancing Algorithmic Performance, Privacy, and Regulatory Compliance},
journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
year = {2025},
volume = {9},
number = {1},
pages = {215-231},
issn = {2456-8880},
url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1709491.pdf},
abstract = {The rapid growth of digital banking has heightened concerns over cybersecurity, privacy, and regulatory compliance, particularly in the detection and prevention of financial fraud. Traditional centralized machine learning approaches to fraud detection are limited by data privacy regulations and the increasing complexity of cyber threats. Federated Learning (FL), a decentralized machine learning technique, offers a promising alternative by enabling multiple institutions to collaboratively train models without sharing raw data. This study critically evaluates the application of FL in privacy-preserving fraud detection within the banking sector, focusing on algorithmic performance, privacy implications, and regulatory compliance. The paper reviews existing literature, assesses technical challenges such as data heterogeneity and communication overhead, and presents case studies of FL implementation in real-world banking contexts. The findings reveal that FL significantly enhances privacy and regulatory alignment while maintaining competitive fraud detection performance. The study concludes by offering strategic recommendations for digital banks and regulatory bodies and identifies future research directions that emphasize adaptive learning algorithms, robust evaluation frameworks, and long-term federated infrastructure in financial systems.},
keywords = {Federated Learning; Fraud Detection; Digital Banking; Privacy; Regulatory Compliance; Machine Learning},
month = {July},
}