International Peer-Reviewed JournalOpen AccessISSN 2456-8880
irejournals@gmail.com+91-7433024337

Home / Current Issue / Paper 1714193

1714193 Vol 9 · Issue 8 Download Paper

AgroMind Grow Plant Disease Detection

Shantu Dhami Mayank Yadav Gopal Ji Sourav Mohammad Haris

Subject area: Science,Engineering and Technology  ·  Area of research: Application and Machine Learning

DOI: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I8-1714193

Abstract

Agriculture is foundational to livelihoods and national economies, particularly in India. This paper presents AgroMind Grow, an end-to-end smart agriculture platform that consolidates weather intelligence, market analytics, crop calendar and planning, AI-powered plant disease detection and guidance, equipment tracking, expert consultation, farm planning, government scheme access, and an educational knowledge base into a unified web system. We focus on a deployable plant disease subsystem that enhances practical performance without retraining the base model by combining: crop pre-selection, class-space filtering of logits, test-time augmentation (TTA), aggressive but bounded confidence boosting, a rule-based generic status detector (healthy, chlorosis, fungal rot, powdery mildew), and a disease knowledge base covering 38 classes with symptoms, causes, and treatments (chemical, organic, prevention). Using EfficientNet-B2 (260×260), we report 99.74% validation accuracy (PlantVillage). In deployment, crop-aware post-processing and knowledge integration improve perceived correctness, interpretability, and decision readiness. Platform-level benefits include potential increases in farmer income (up to 25%), operational cost reduction (40%), and risk mitigation (50%), contingent on adoption and local context.

Keywords

Smart Agriculture, Plant Disease Detection, EfficientNet-B1, Confidence Calibration, Test-Time Augmentation, Knowledge Base, FastAPI, React.

References

[1] J. Brice, “McKinsey: Agriculture’s digital transformation,” Nov. 2020. [Online]. Available: https://businesschief.com/technology-and-ai/mckinsey-agricultures-digital-transformation

[2] P. K. Das, “Leaf Disease Classification in Bell Pepper Plant using VGGNet,” Journal of Innovative Image Processing, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 36–46, Apr. 2023. [Online]. Available: https://irojournals.com/iroiip/article/view/5/1/3

[3] K. P. Ferentinos, “Deep learning models for plant disease detection and diagnosis,” Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, vol. 145, pp. 311–318, 2018.

[4] M. Tan and Q. V. Le, “Efficientnet: Rethinking model scaling for convolutional neural networks,” in ICML, 2019. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1905.11946

[5] J. G. A. Barbedo, “Impact of dataset size and variety on the effectiveness of deep learning and transfer learning for plant disease classification,” Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, vol. 153, pp. 46–53, 2018.

[6] M. Arsenovic et al., “Solving current limitations of deep learning based approaches for plant disease detection,” Symmetry, vol. 11, no. 7, p. 939, 2019.

[7] T. Domingues, T. Branda˜o, and J. Ferreira, “Machine Learning for Detection and Prediction of Crop Diseases and Pests: A Comprehensive Survey,” Agriculture, vol. 12, p. 1350, Sep. 2022.

[8] K. Schroeder, J. Lampietti, and G. Elabed, What’s Cooking: Digital Transformation of the Agrifood System. The World Bank, 2021.

[9] S. P. Mohanty, D. P. Hughes, and M. Salathe´, “Using deep learning for image-based plant disease detection,” Frontiers in Plant Science, vol. 7, p. 1419, 2016.

[10] S. Sladojevic, M. Arsenovic, A. Anderla, D. Culibrk, and D. Ste-fanovic, “Deep neural networks based recognition of plant diseases by leaf image classification,” Computational Intelligence and Neuroscience, 2016.

[11] A. Picon et al., “Deep convolutional neural networks for mobile capture device-based crop disease classification in tomato plants,” Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, vol. 161, pp. 280–290, 2019.

[12] E. C. Too et al., “A comparative study of cnn architectures for plant disease detection,” Computers and Electronics in Agriculture, vol. 161, pp. 272–279, 2019.

[13] K. He, X. Zhang, S. Ren, and J. Sun, “Deep residual learning for image recognition,” in CVPR, 2016.

[14] C. Szegedy et al., “Rethinking the inception architecture for computer vision,” in CVPR, 2016.

[15] A. Howard et al., “Mobilenets: Efficient convolutional neural networks for mobile vision applications,” in arXiv, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1704.04861

[16] A. Dosovitskiy et al., “An image is worth 16x16 words: Transformers for image recognition at scale,” in ICLR, 2021. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/2010.11929

[17] C. Shorten and T. M. Khoshgoftaar, “A survey on image data augmentation for deep learning,” Journal of Big Data, vol. 6, p. 60, 2019.

[18] H. Zhang et al., “mixup: Beyond empirical risk minimization,” in ICLR, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1710.09412

[19] S. Yun et al., “Cutmix: Regularization strategy to train strong classifiers with localizable features,” in ICCV, 2019.

[20] M. S. Ayhan and P. Berens, “Test-time data augmentation for estimation of heteroscedastic aleatoric uncertainty in deep neural networks,” Medical Imaging with Deep Learning (Workshop), 2018. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1806.02121

[21] C. Guo, G. Pleiss, Y. Sun, and K. Q. Weinberger, “On calibration of modern neural networks,” in ICML, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1706.04599

[22] B. Lakshminarayanan, A. Pritzel, and C. Blundell, “Simple and scalable predictive uncertainty estimation using deep ensembles,” in NeurIPS, 2017. [Online]. Available: https: //arxiv.org/abs/1612.01474

[23] V. Kuleshov, N. Fenner, and S. Ermon, “Accurate uncertainties for deep learning using calibrated regression,” ICML, 2018. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1807.00263

[24] D. Hendrycks and K. Gimpel, “Baseline uncertainty and rejection for deep classifiers,” in ICLR Workshop, 2017. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1610.02136

[25] Y. Ganin and V. Lempitsky, “Unsupervised domain adaptation by backpropagation,” in ICML, 2015. [Online]. Available: https://arxiv.org/abs/1409.7495

[26] E. Tzeng, J. Hoffman, K. Saenko, and T. Darrell, “Adversarial discriminative domain adaptation,” in CVPR, 2017.

[27] L. Breiman, “Random forests,” Machine Learning, vol. 45, pp. 5–32, 2001.

[28] T. Chen and C. Guestrin, “Xgboost: A scalable tree boosting system,” in KDD, 2016.

[29] C. Cortes and V. Vapnik, “Support-vector networks,” Machine Learning, vol. 20, pp. 273–297, 1995.

[30] T. Cover and P. Hart, “Nearest neighbor pattern classification,” IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, vol. 13, no. 1, pp. 21–27, 1967.

[31] L. Breiman, J. H. Friedman, R. A. Olshen, and C. J. Stone, Classification and Regression Trees. Wadsworth, 1984.

[32] D. M. Woebbecke et al., “Color indices for weed identification under various soil, residue, and lighting conditions,” Transactions of the ASAE, vol. 38, no. 1, pp. 259–269, 1995.

[33] N. Otsu, “A threshold selection method from gray-level histograms,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 62–66, 1979.

[34] S. Savary et al., “The global burden of pathogens and pests on major food crops,” Nature Ecology & Evolution, vol. 3, no. 3, pp. 430–439, 2019.

[35] Food and Agriculture Organization, “Integrated pest management guidelines,” 2017. [Online]. Available: http://www.fao.org/ agriculture/crops/core-themes/theme/pests/ipm/en/

[36] J. Deng et al., “Imagenet: A large-scale hierarchical image database,” in CVPR, 2009.

[37] A. Paszke et al., “Pytorch: An imperative style, high-performance deep learning library,” in NeurIPS, 2019.

[38] TorchVision Contributors, “Torchvision: Pytorch vision library,” 2017. [Online]. Available: https://pytorch.org/vision/stable/

[39] S. Ram´ırez, “Fastapi documentation,” 2019. [Online]. Available: https://fastapi.tiangolo.com/

[40] React Contributors, “React: A javascript library for building user interfaces,” 2013. [Online]. Available: https://react.dev/

[41] C. R. Harris et al., “Array programming with numpy,” Nature, vol. 585, pp. 357–362, 2020.

[42] W. McKinney, “Data structures for statistical computing in python,” in Proceedings of the 9th Python in Science Conference, 2010, pp. 51–56.

[43] F. Pedregosa et al., “Scikit-learn: Machine learning in python,” Journal of Machine Learning Research, vol. 12, pp. 2825–2830, 2011.

[44] G. Bradski, “The opencv library,” Dr. Dobb’s Journal of Software Tools, 2000.

How to cite this paper

Shantu Dhami, Mayank Yadav, Gopal Ji, Sourav, Mohammad Haris "AgroMind Grow Plant Disease Detection" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals Volume 9 Issue 8 2026 Page 412-419 https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I8-1714193
Shantu Dhami, Mayank Yadav, Gopal Ji, Sourav, Mohammad Haris "AgroMind Grow Plant Disease Detection" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 9, no. 8, Feb. 2026, doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I8-1714193
Shantu Dhami, Mayank Yadav, Gopal Ji, Sourav, Mohammad Haris (2026). AgroMind Grow Plant Disease Detection. Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, 9(8). doi: https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I8-1714193
Shantu Dhami, Mayank Yadav, Gopal Ji, Sourav, Mohammad Haris "AgroMind Grow Plant Disease Detection" Iconic Research And Engineering Journals, vol. 9, no. 8, Feb. 2026. Crossref, https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I8-1714193
@article{1714193,
      author = {Shantu Dhami, Mayank Yadav, Gopal Ji, Sourav, Mohammad Haris},
      title = {AgroMind Grow Plant Disease Detection},
      journal = {Iconic Research And Engineering Journals},
      year = {2026},
      volume = {9},
      number = {8},
      pages = {412-419},
      issn = {2456-8880},
      url = {https://www.irejournals.com/formatedpaper/1714193.pdf},
      abstract = {Agriculture is foundational to livelihoods and national economies, particularly in India. This paper presents AgroMind Grow, an end-to-end smart agriculture platform that consolidates weather intelligence, market analytics, crop calendar and planning, AI-powered plant disease detection and guidance, equipment tracking, expert consultation, farm planning, government scheme access, and an educational knowledge base into a unified web system. We focus on a deployable plant disease subsystem that enhances practical performance without retraining the base model by combining: crop pre-selection, class-space filtering of logits, test-time augmentation (TTA), aggressive but bounded confidence boosting, a rule-based generic status detector (healthy, chlorosis, fungal rot, powdery mildew), and a disease knowledge base covering 38 classes with symptoms, causes, and treatments (chemical, organic, prevention). Using EfficientNet-B2 (260×260), we report 99.74% validation accuracy (PlantVillage). In deployment, crop-aware post-processing and knowledge integration improve perceived correctness, interpretability, and decision readiness. Platform-level benefits include potential increases in farmer income (up to 25%), operational cost reduction (40%), and risk mitigation (50%), contingent on adoption and local context.},
      keywords = {Smart Agriculture, Plant Disease Detection, EfficientNet-B1, Confidence Calibration, Test-Time Augmentation, Knowledge Base, FastAPI, React.},
      month = {February},
      doi = {https://doi.org/10.64388/IREV9I8-1714193}
  }